GDPR Fines & Penalties 2026
Search GDPR fines, penalties, warnings, orders, bans, and investigations across Europe by country, action type, GDPR article, and violation category.
Frequently Asked Questions About GDPR Enforcement
Q:What types of GDPR enforcement actions exist?
GDPR enforcement actions include monetary fines (the most publicised), formal warnings, reprimands, processing bans, data erasure orders, and compliance orders. DPAs can also impose temporary or permanent limitations on data processing. Fines can reach up to EUR 20 million or 4% of annual worldwide turnover, whichever is higher, under Article 83(5) GDPR.
Q:How are GDPR fines calculated by data protection authorities?
DPAs consider factors listed in Article 83(2) GDPR: nature, gravity, and duration of the infringement; intentional or negligent character; actions taken to mitigate damage; degree of responsibility; previous infringements; degree of cooperation; categories of personal data affected; how the infringement became known; and adherence to approved codes of conduct or certification mechanisms.
Q:Can GDPR fines be appealed?
Yes, GDPR fines can be appealed through national courts. Many high-profile fines have been challenged. The appeals process varies by country. Some fines have been reduced on appeal (e.g., British Airways' fine was reduced from GBP 183 million to GBP 20 million), while others have been upheld or even increased.
Browse case links on this page
GDPR Enforcement Actions (247 total)
- SIA Quantrum (Latvia) – complaint upheld – Feb 2024
- Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Feb 2024
- Airbnb Ireland UC (Ireland) – complaint upheld – Jan 2024
- Ayuntamiento de Llucmajor (Spain) – complaint upheld – Jan 2024
- Consejería de Economía, Conocimiento y Empleo (Spain) – complaint upheld – Jan 2024
- University of Iceland (Iceland) – complaint upheld – Jan 2024
- CRIF Bürgel (Germany) – complaint upheld – Dec 2023
- Ms. X, represented by noyb - European Center for Digital Rights (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Nov 2023 | Cannot Withdraw Cookie Consent, Misleading Banner Messaging, No Reject Button, Reject Harder Than Accept
- C.B. Sistemi s.r.l. (Italy) – complaint upheld – Nov 2023
- Mediafin (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Nov 2023 | Cannot Withdraw Cookie Consent, Misleading Banner Messaging, No Reject Button, Reject Harder Than Accept
- Editoriale Argo S.r.l. (Italy) – complaint upheld – Nov 2023
- Reti Televisive Italiane S.p.a. (Italy) – complaint upheld – Nov 2023
- Microsoft Operations Ireland Limited (Ireland) – complaint upheld – Nov 2023
- Madame X1 and Monsieur X2 (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Nov 2023
- Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industrial and Digital Sovereignty (France) – complaint upheld – Nov 2023
- Dr. Franziska A. (Austria) – complaint upheld – Nov 2023
- doctor and sole managing director of the laboratory (first data subject) (Austria) – complaint upheld – Oct 2023
- AirBnb Ireland UC (Ireland) – complaint upheld – Sept 2023
- Briggs & Stratton LLC (Austria) – complaint upheld – Sept 2023 | No Granular Cookie Choice, No Reject Button, Third-Party Cookies Without Consent
- Hearst Magazine Media, Inc. (Austria) – complaint upheld – Sept 2023 | No Reject Button, Third-Party Cookies Without Consent
- Airbnb Ireland UC (Ireland) – complaint upheld – Sept 2023
- AJPES (Agency of the Republic of Slovenia for Public Legal Records and Related Services) (Slovenia) – complaint upheld – Sept 2023
- SERVICIO CANARIO DE LA SALUD (Spain) – complaint upheld – Sept 2023
- Freedom Finance Europe Ltd (Cyprus) – complaint upheld – Sept 2023
- AGRUPACION DE LOS CUERPOS DE LA ADMINISTRACION DE INSTITUCIONES PENITENCIARIAS (Spain) – complaint upheld – Sept 2023