GDPR Fines & Penalties 2026
Search GDPR fines, penalties, warnings, orders, bans, and investigations across Europe by country, action type, GDPR article, and violation category.
Frequently Asked Questions About GDPR Enforcement
Q:What types of GDPR enforcement actions exist?
GDPR enforcement actions include monetary fines (the most publicised), formal warnings, reprimands, processing bans, data erasure orders, and compliance orders. DPAs can also impose temporary or permanent limitations on data processing. Fines can reach up to EUR 20 million or 4% of annual worldwide turnover, whichever is higher, under Article 83(5) GDPR.
Q:How are GDPR fines calculated by data protection authorities?
DPAs consider factors listed in Article 83(2) GDPR: nature, gravity, and duration of the infringement; intentional or negligent character; actions taken to mitigate damage; degree of responsibility; previous infringements; degree of cooperation; categories of personal data affected; how the infringement became known; and adherence to approved codes of conduct or certification mechanisms.
Q:Can GDPR fines be appealed?
Yes, GDPR fines can be appealed through national courts. Many high-profile fines have been challenged. The appeals process varies by country. Some fines have been reduced on appeal (e.g., British Airways' fine was reduced from GBP 183 million to GBP 20 million), while others have been upheld or even increased.
Browse case links on this page
GDPR Enforcement Actions (247 total)
- Elgiganten A/S (Denmark) – complaint upheld – Jun 2022
- an unnamed professional (Italy) – complaint upheld – Jun 2022
- Klarna Bank (Sweden) – complaint upheld – Jun 2022
- XX (data subject) (Italy) – complaint upheld – Jun 2022
- an unnamed data subject (Italy) – complaint upheld – May 2022
- Zalaris ASA (Norway) – complaint upheld – May 2022
- Budapest Bar Association (Hungary) – complaint upheld – May 2022
- Klarna Bank AB (Sweden) – complaint upheld – May 2022
- Police University College (Finland) – complaint upheld – May 2022
- HERTZ DE ESPAÑA, S.L. (Spain) – complaint upheld – Apr 2022
- Ellos Group AB (Sweden) – complaint upheld – Mar 2022
- Reykjavík University (Iceland) – complaint upheld – Mar 2022
- noyb (France) – complaint upheld – Feb 2022
- TV 2 (Denmark) – complaint upheld – Feb 2022
- Company X (Finland) – complaint upheld – Feb 2022
- Redacted (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Jan 2022
- website visitor and Google user (data subject and complainant) (Austria) – complaint upheld – Dec 2021 | Cookies Placed Before Consent, Third-Party Cookies Without Consent
- Silkeborg Municipality (Denmark) – complaint upheld – Nov 2021
- Disziplinarrat der Österreichischen Ärztekammer (Austria) – complaint upheld – Nov 2021
- Komplett Bank ASA (Norway) – complaint upheld – Nov 2021 | Misleading Banner Messaging
- Oikeusrekisterikeskus (Finland) – complaint upheld – Nov 2021
- Bisnode Finland Oy (Finland) – complaint upheld – Nov 2021
- Suomen Asiakastieto Oy (Finland) – complaint upheld – Nov 2021
- Alstrøm – Din Isenkræmmer ApS (Denmark) – complaint upheld – Oct 2021 | No Granular Cookie Choice, No Reject Button
- Falkonergården (High School) (Denmark) – complaint upheld – Oct 2021