GDPR Fines & Penalties 2026
Search GDPR fines, penalties, warnings, orders, bans, and investigations across Europe by country, action type, GDPR article, and violation category.
Frequently Asked Questions About GDPR Enforcement
Q:What types of GDPR enforcement actions exist?
GDPR enforcement actions include monetary fines (the most publicised), formal warnings, reprimands, processing bans, data erasure orders, and compliance orders. DPAs can also impose temporary or permanent limitations on data processing. Fines can reach up to EUR 20 million or 4% of annual worldwide turnover, whichever is higher, under Article 83(5) GDPR.
Q:How are GDPR fines calculated by data protection authorities?
DPAs consider factors listed in Article 83(2) GDPR: nature, gravity, and duration of the infringement; intentional or negligent character; actions taken to mitigate damage; degree of responsibility; previous infringements; degree of cooperation; categories of personal data affected; how the infringement became known; and adherence to approved codes of conduct or certification mechanisms.
Q:Can GDPR fines be appealed?
Yes, GDPR fines can be appealed through national courts. Many high-profile fines have been challenged. The appeals process varies by country. Some fines have been reduced on appeal (e.g., British Airways' fine was reduced from GBP 183 million to GBP 20 million), while others have been upheld or even increased.
Browse case links on this page
GDPR Enforcement Actions (131 total)
- Court case 2022/AR/560 & 2022/AR/564 (Belgium) – court ruling – Jan 2023
- Court case 2022/AR/556 (Belgium) – court ruling – Dec 2022
- Mister X (the data subject) (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Nov 2022
- RTBF (Belgium) – dismissed – Nov 2022 | Cookies Placed Before Consent, Third-Party Cookies Without Consent
- Zorg & Gezondheid (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Nov 2022
- Toerisme Vlaanderen (Belgium) – violation found – Nov 2022 | Cookies Placed Before Consent, No Reject Button, Unclear Cookie Information
- X (the data subject) (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Nov 2022
- Company (Belgium) – €3K – Aug 2022
- Medical laboratory (Belgium) – €20K – Aug 2022
- FOD Financiën (Belgium) – dismissed – Jun 2022
- Rossel Group (sudinfo) (Belgium) – €50K – Jun 2022 | Cannot Withdraw Cookie Consent, Cookies Placed Before Consent, Pre-ticked Consent Boxes, Third-Party Cookies Without Consent, Unclear Cookie Information
- SA Rossel & Cie (Belgium) – €0 – Jun 2022 | Cookies Persist After Rejection, Cookies Placed Before Consent, Pre-ticked Consent Boxes, Third-Party Cookies Without Consent, Unclear Cookie Information
- De Tijd (Belgium) – dismissed – Jun 2022
- Roularta Media Group (Belgium) – €50K – May 2022 | Cannot Withdraw Cookie Consent, Cookies Placed Before Consent, Pre-ticked Consent Boxes, Third-Party Cookies Without Consent, Unclear Cookie Information
- Nationale Maatschappij der Belgische Spoorwegen (Belgium) – €10K – May 2022
- NMBS (Belgium) – €10K – May 2022
- Controller (Belgium) – court ruling – Apr 2022
- Complainant: Mr. X (Belgium) – dismissed – Apr 2022
- Ambuce Rescue Team (Belgium) – €20K – Apr 2022
- Brussels Airport Charleroi (Belgium) – €100K – Apr 2022
- Brussels Airport Zaventem (Belgium) – €200K – Apr 2022
- Brussels airport (Belgium) – €200K – Apr 2022
- Company (Belgium) – €8K – Apr 2022
- Mr X - unknown (Belgium) – dismissed – Mar 2022
- IAB Europe (Belgium) – €0 – Feb 2022 | Misleading Banner Messaging, No Granular Cookie Choice, Third-Party Cookies Without Consent, Unclear Cookie Information