LinkedIn – €310,000,000 Fine (Ireland, 2024)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
LinkedIn was fined EUR 310 million for not being clear about how it uses user data. This is significant because it shows that companies must be transparent and obtain proper consent from users when processing their data. Small businesses should ensure they communicate clearly with users about data usage.
What happened
LinkedIn was found to have processed user data without a valid legal basis and failed to provide clear information about its data practices.
Who was affected
LinkedIn users whose data was processed for behavioral analysis and targeted advertising were affected.
What the authority found
The authority ruled that LinkedIn violated several GDPR principles, including fairness and transparency, and could not justify its data processing methods.
Why this matters
This case sets a strong precedent for transparency in data processing. Small business owners should review their data practices to ensure they are clear and compliant with regulations.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
On the 20 August 2018, the French non-profit organisation “La Quadrature du Net” filed a complaint against LinkedIn for intransparent data processing. The complaint had initially been made to the French DPA (CNIL) and was later taken over by the Irish DPA (DPC) as the lead supervisory authority for LinkedIn. The inquiry analysed LinkedIn’s processing of personal data for the purposes of behavioural analysis and targeted advertising to its users. It focussed on the obligation to provide information to data subjects and whether LinkedIn could rely on a legal basis for under Article 6 GDPR for this processing. In a press realease, the DPC highlighted that LinkedIn had breached the overarching principles of fairness and transparency (Article 5(1)(a) GDPR) all throughout the course of the processing. The inquiry found that none of the legal basis invoked by LinkedIn justified the data processing at hand. Specifically, the consent of the LinkedIn users to this processing had not been freely given, sufficiently informed, specific or unambiguous. Further, LinkedIn’s legitimate interests were overridden by the interests and fundamental rights and freedoms of data subjects and LinkedIn could not rely on contractual necessity for the processing. In addition, the inquiry showed that the information provided to data subjects by LinkedIn regarding the lawful basis it claimed to rely on, namely Article 6(1)(a), 6(1)(b) and 6(1)(f) GDPR was insufficient. The DPC held that LinkedIn could not rely on consent under Article 6(1)(a) GDPR, legitimate interests under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR nor contractual necessity under Article 6(1)(b) GDPR for its processing. In addition to Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, the DPC held that the information provided to data subjects violated Articles 13(1)(c) and 14(1)(c) GDPR. Made up of three administrative fines, the DPC fined LinkedIn with a total of €310,000,000 for infringements of Articles 5(1)(a), 6(1)(a), 6(1)(f), 6(1)(b), 13(1)(c) and 14(1)(c) GDPR.
Related Enforcement Actions (1)
Other enforcement actions involving LinkedIn in IE
Details
Fine Date
22 October 2024
Authority
Data Protection Commission
Fine Amount
€310,000,000
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-8503About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. LinkedIn - Ireland (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: