GOOGLE LLC – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2019)

Court Ruling
DPA RbNoord-Nederland12 December 2019Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Dutch court ruled that Google cannot keep showing search results about a person’s past criminal conviction without proper legal grounds. This matters because it highlights the importance of privacy and the right to be forgotten, especially for individuals who have served their time.

What happened

Google refused to remove search results related to a person's criminal conviction despite a request.

Who was affected

The individual whose criminal history was displayed in Google search results.

What the authority found

The court decided that Google lacked a valid legal basis to process and display this personal data under data protection rules.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes that companies like Google must carefully consider privacy rights when handling sensitive information. It sets a precedent for how personal data, especially regarding criminal records, should be treated online.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 10(GDPR)
Art. 17(GDPR)
Art. 21(GDPR)
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 10(GDPR)
Art. 17(GDPR)
Art. 21(GDPR)

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Decision AuthorityRb. Noord-Nederland
Source verified 23 March 2026
articles corrected
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On 1 December 2006 plaintiff was arrested and charged of murdering an 8-year old boy. The first conviction was on 6 September 2007 and after multiple appeals on 22 may 2012 the final verdict was 11 years and 7 month prison followed by an involuntary commitment. The European Court of Human Rights rejected the application he made there. During the whole time, there was a lot of media coverage about this case and all proceedings. On 24 May 2015 the involuntary commitment started, and it has been extended with two years twice on 2 June 2017 and 29 May 2019. There was also media coverage about these extensions. When searching using Google search for the name of plaintiff, a lot of search results are found with publications about the crime he committed and the legal proceedings afterwards. After a request, Google removed 100 search results, but denied to remove 82 other results. It explained that with: "It is Google's understanding that the information about your client on these URL's - with regard to all the circumstances of the case we are aware of - is still relevant in relation to the purposes of data processing, and therefore the reference to this document in our search results is justified by the public interest." = The search results include information about criminal convictions and background of the crime. Based on Article 10 GDPR data processing about criminal convictions is only allowed under the control of an official authority. Data processing would also be allowed if processing is authorised by Union or Member State law, but this does not apply. Based on this, Google may not process this data. Article 32 GDPR and Article 33 GDPR also cannot justify the processing. Based on [https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document_print.jsf?doclang=EN&text=&pageIndex=0&docid=152065&cid=244711 CJEU - C-131/12 Google Spain], [https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:HR:2017:316 Hoge Raad - 15/03380] and Article 17 GDPR a weighing of the interests

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Details

Ruling Date

12 December 2019

Authority

DPA RbNoord-Nederland

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. GOOGLE LLC - Netherlands (2019). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: