Enforcing jurisdiction
Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
No confirmed legal basis recorded.
Privacy topics

Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (Dutch DPA) – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA RbRotterdam1 May 2020Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court ruled that the Dutch Data Protection Authority delayed its decision on a case and must pay a penalty. This ruling is important because it holds authorities accountable for timely responses. It reminds organizations that they must handle complaints efficiently.

What happened

The court found that the Dutch DPA delayed delivering a decision to a claimant.

Who was affected

The claimant who was waiting for a decision from the Dutch DPA.

What the authority found

The court ruled that the DPA was responsible for the delay due to postal service issues and must pay a penalty for the late decision.

Why this matters

This case sets a precedent for timely decision-making by authorities. Organizations should ensure they are responsive to complaints to avoid penalties.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Article 3:41 Dutch administrative law
Article 4:17(1)(2) Dutch administrative law
Decision AuthorityRb. Rotterdam

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On 8 January 2019 DPA agreed to pay a penalty to the claimant for delaying the decision on her case. The decision was due on 30 November 2018. According to the DPA, the penalty was supposed to be 60 EUR for the delay until 3 December 2018. Claimant objected because the registered letter with the decision was delivered to her on 8 January 2019 instead of 3 December 2018. On 8 May 2019 DPA declared the claimant’s objection not valid. Claimant launched an appeal. The Court must assess whether the DPA was responsible for the delay in delivering the decision caused by a mistake at the postal service. The Court agreed with the claimant. Article 4:17(1) of the Dutch administrative law says that an administrative body must pay penalties for not handling complaints in a timely manner. Article 4:17(2) of the same law defines the size of the penalty: 23 EUR per day for the first 14 days of delay, 35 EUR per day for the subsequent 14 days and 45 EUR per day after that. The Court ruled that a decision can be considered finalized when the applicant is made aware of it. In the present case the decision was sent to the complaint by registered mail, but it arrived with a delay because of a mistake at the postal service. According to the Court, this fact did not relieve the DPA of its responsibility: Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens should have considered the risks of sending the decision by post when choosing method of communication.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Details

Ruling Date

1 May 2020

Authority

DPA RbRotterdam

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (Dutch DPA) - Netherlands (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: