- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
AVROTROS – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2020)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
AVROTROS planned to air a program that accused a person of fraud, but the person tried to stop it. The court decided that the broadcaster could proceed because it was for journalistic purposes. This matters because it highlights the balance between privacy and freedom of the press.
What happened
AVROTROS was allowed to broadcast a program featuring a person accused of fraud despite the person's objections.
Who was affected
The individual who was portrayed in the program and accused of fraud.
What the authority found
The court ruled that AVROTROS's processing of personal data was justified for journalistic purposes under data protection laws.
Why this matters
This ruling illustrates the legal protections for journalistic activities, emphasizing that media organizations can report on matters of public interest while still needing to consider privacy rights.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
AVROTROS (defendant) is a Dutch radio and television broadcaster that is part of the Dutch public broadcasting system. It broadcasts a weekly program called ‘Opgelicht ?!’, which is a program about fraud. In one of the episodes AVROTROS plans to broadcast an item in which plaintiff is recognizably portrayed and accused of committing fraud. Plaintiff tries to prevent AVROTROS from broadcasting this item. The judge has to balance the interests of AVROTROS against the interests of the plaintiff. With regards to the GDPR, the judge holds that the processing of personal data is a processing for journalistic purposes as specified in Article 85 GDPR, Article 32 of the Dutch GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG) and Article 7 of the Constitution of the Netherlands. The legal basis for the processing is Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. Plaintiff's request was denied.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (2)
Other cases involving AVROTROS in NL
Court Ruling
Details
Ruling Date
29 September 2020
Authority
DPA RbMidden-Nederland
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. AVROTROS - Netherlands (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: