Minister of Agriculture, Nature and Food quality – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA RbMidden-Nederland8 December 2020Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Dutch court decided that the Dutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority only needed to provide an overview of personal data, not the actual documents, when asked by a requester. This matters because it clarifies what information must be shared under data access requests.

What happened

The Dutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority provided an incomplete overview of personal data requested by a plaintiff.

Who was affected

The plaintiff who represents others in legal procedures against the authority and requested access to their personal data.

What the authority found

The court ruled that providing an overview of processed personal data was sufficient and that specific documents were not required.

Why this matters

This case sets a precedent for how personal data access requests can be handled, indicating that an overview may suffice. Organizations should understand their obligations when responding to such requests.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 15(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 15(1) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Decision AuthorityRb. Midden-Nederland
Source verified 20 March 2026
verified correct
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

Plaintiff regularly represents others in Open Government Act (Wet openbaarheid van bestuur) procedures against the Dutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (hereafter: NVWA). Plaintiff requested access to the personal data processed by the NVWA with regards to these procedures, basing their claim on article 15(1) GDPR. The NVWA partially granted the request and gave plaintiff an overview of the data processed by them with regards to the aforementioned procedures and who has access to this information. Plaintiff objected to the primary decision because - among other things - the overview was incomplete. Defendant ruled that the objection justified, revoked the primary decision gave a more complete overview. Plaintiff appealed to the decision, and argues that an overview of the processed personal data is not enough. They argue that they need a copy of the specific documents in which their personal data is processed to assess the accuracy of the data in context of these documents. The court held that to comply with an article 15(1) GDPR request, it is sufficient to provide an overview of what data is processed and in which documents, if the data in question is mostly name, address and contact information. A copy of the documents itself does not need to be provided.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Minister of Agriculture, Nature and Food quality in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

8 December 2020

Authority

DPA RbMidden-Nederland

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Minister of Agriculture, Nature and Food quality - Netherlands (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: