Facebook – Court Ruling (Germany, 2024)

Court Ruling
DPA LGRegensburg15 April 2024Germany
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court in Germany ruled that Facebook did not respond properly to a user's request for information about their data. This ruling is important because it emphasizes that companies must be clear and timely in their responses to user inquiries about personal data.

What happened

Facebook failed to provide timely access to a user's personal data as required by law.

Who was affected

The user of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp was affected by the company's inadequate response.

What the authority found

The court held that Facebook did not comply with the legal requirements for providing access to personal data.

Why this matters

This ruling sets a precedent for how companies should handle user requests for data access. Website operators must ensure they have processes in place to respond to such requests promptly.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 15(GDPR)
Art. 17(GDPR)
Art. 82(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 15(GDPR)
Art. 17(GDPR)
Art. 82(1) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Decision AuthorityLG Regensburg
Source verified 20 March 2026
verified correct
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject is a user of the Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp platforms. On 3 November 2023, Facebook (“the controller”) introduced their “Pay or Okay” model. On 10 November 2023, the data subject consented to the use of their data for ads on Facebook and Instagram. On 15 May 2023, the data subject requested access, damages and injunctive relief from the Regional court Regensburg (“Landgericht Regensburg”). The controller answered that it could not reply within the deadline under Article 12(3) GDPR, but only within three months’ time. The controller replied on 5 June 2023. The controller stated that it does not forward any information for advertising purposes to advertisers who personally identify users in the context of the processing at issue, unless the user has consented to the forwarding of their data to a specific advertiser. On 13 February 2024, the data subject amended its application and requested the Regional court Regensburg (“Landgericht Regensburg”) to order the controller to provide access under Article 15 GDPR and answer the specific questions the data subject had about their personal data in connection with the targeted advertising. Moreover, the data subject requested the Court to order the controller to pay the data subject non-material damages and to erase the personal data collected in the period between 25 May 2018 and 6 November 2023 under Article 17 GDPR. The data subject argued that they suffered a loss of control over its personal data. The inadequate information provided by the controller resulted in the data subject not knowing how their personal data had possibly been passed on to which third parties, or how it had been used by the controller for targeted advertising. Moreover, the data subject argued that they had received a lot of spam due to leaked data from his Facebook account. The data subject also argued that they always found the use of their personal data for the purposes of advertising aimed at them personally unpleasa

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Details

Ruling Date

15 April 2024

Authority

DPA LGRegensburg

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Facebook - Germany (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: