Facebook – Court Ruling (Germany, 2025)

Court Ruling
DPA AGMnchen13 February 2025Germany
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A German court addressed a case involving Facebook, where a user claimed that the company processed his personal data unlawfully for targeted advertising. The user felt uncomfortable with the ads and sought damages, but the court ruled that he did not have a valid claim against Facebook. This case emphasizes the ongoing debate about user consent and data processing practices.

What happened

A user sued Facebook for unlawfully processing his personal data for targeted advertising without proper consent.

Who was affected

The user of Facebook who was affected by the targeted advertising practices.

What the authority found

The court decided that the user did not have a valid claim against Facebook regarding the processing of his personal data.

Why this matters

This ruling illustrates the complexities of consent and data processing in digital advertising. It serves as a reminder for companies to clearly communicate their data practices and ensure compliance with privacy laws.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 82(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 82(1) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Decision AuthorityAG München
Source verified 19 March 2026
verified correct
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject is a user of the platform www.facebook.com provided by Facebook (now Meta), the controller. Facebook uses personalised advertising that is tailored to the online behaviour of network users. When the GDPR came into force, Facebook initially processed personal data for the placement of personalised advertising under the legal basis of Article 6(1)(b) GDPR, performance of a contract. From April 2023, Facebook changed the legal basis to Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, legitimate interest. Since November 2023, Facebook started implementing the pay or ok model, where users could choose to either consent to the use of their data for personalised advertising on its platforms or pay a subscription fee to prevent the processing. The data subject consented to the processing of his personal data for targeted advertising. In January 2024, the data subject demanded out-of-court compensation and deletion or restriction of his personal data due to unlawful processing of his personal data but he received no answer. The data subject filed a case before the Munich District Court (Amtsgericht München - AG München) claiming that Facebook processed his personal data unlawfully, in violation of Article 5(1)(a) GDPR because the processing was not necessary for the performance of the contract or to protect legitimate interests and he did not consent to the processing before November 2023. The data subject claimed that he was entitled to immaterial damages in the amount of €1,000 because receiving targeted advertising was unpleasant and frightening to him. He further demanded that Facebook would provide him with his personal data regarding his online behaviour collected before he consented to the processing in 2023, delete the data if it is processed exclusively for advertising purposes and restrict processing to purposes other than advertising, insofar as the data are necessary for platform use. First, the court held that the data subject had no claim against Facebook for n

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Details

Ruling Date

13 February 2025

Authority

DPA AGMnchen

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Facebook - Germany (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: