CNIL – Court Ruling (France, 2023)

Court Ruling
DPA CE4 May 2023France
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court upheld the CNIL's decision to close a complaint against the Irish Stock Exchange, ruling that the Irish Data Protection Authority should handle the case. This matters because it clarifies which authority is in charge when personal data is processed across borders. It shows that complaints must go to the right country’s authority based on where the company operates.

What happened

The court confirmed that the CNIL correctly closed a complaint about the Irish Stock Exchange's handling of personal data.

Who was affected

The complaint involved a person whose personal data was handled by the Irish Stock Exchange, a subsidiary of Euronext.

What the authority found

The court ruled that the Irish Data Protection Authority was the appropriate body to address the complaint, following GDPR rules on cross-border data processing.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes the importance of knowing which data protection authority to approach for complaints, especially in cross-border situations. Businesses should ensure they understand the jurisdiction of data processing activities.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 16(GDPR)
Art. 4(7) GDPR
Art. 56(GDPR)
View original scraped data
Art. 4(7) GDPR
Art. 16(GDPR)
Art. 56(GDPR)

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Decision AuthorityCE
Source verified 22 March 2026
articles corrected
authority corrected
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On March 27, 2018 the Data Subject filed a complaint on CNIL againt Euronext group, specifically addressing the handling of her personal data by the Irish Stock Exchange, her employer, a subsidiary of Euronext. On March 28, 2022, the case was closed by CNIL because the Authority understood that the Irish Data Protection Authority is the one competente for addressing the issue, since the Data Subject employer, the Irish Stock Exchange, is a company located in Ireland. In addition, the Data subject and personal data processed was limited to this location. Dissatisfied with this outcome, the Data Subject sought annulment of the CNIL's decision for abuse of power and requested that the CNIL be instructed to sanction the companies involved. The Conseil d'État rejected the Data Subject's request, upholding the CNIL’s decision to close the complaint. The Court found that the CNIL correctly applied GDPR regulations, specifically Article 55 and Article 56, which dictate that in cross-border data processing situations, the Lead Supervisory Authority is generally that of the main establishment of the controller, unless the data processing is confined to a single member state and significantly affects individuals only in that state. In this case, the CNIL determined that the relevant data processing was indeed cross-border, handled by a central office in France, but the complaint was specific to the Data Subject employment in Ireland, making the Irish Data Protection Authority solely competent to address it.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Details

Ruling Date

4 May 2023

Authority

DPA CE

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. CNIL - France (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: