Meta – Court Ruling (Germany, 2026)
Meta was found to have used tracking tools on other websites without getting users' permission first. This practice violated GDPR rules about consent. The ruling is significant because it reinforces the need for companies to obtain clear consent before tracking users.
What happened
Meta tracked users on third-party websites without obtaining their consent.
Who was affected
Website visitors whose browsing activities were tracked by Meta's tools on other sites.
What the authority found
The court ruled that Meta lacked a valid legal basis for processing personal data, violating GDPR's consent requirements.
Why this matters
This decision highlights that companies must be transparent and obtain consent for tracking. Website operators should review their tracking practices to comply with consent rules.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
Meta's Business Tools tracked user behavior on third-party sites without valid consent, constituting unlawful processing of personal data.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Violations (1)
Third-party tracking cookies or scripts are loaded without obtaining prior user consent.
Art. 13, 14 GDPR
Related Cases (3)
Other cases involving Meta in DE
Court Ruling
Similar Cases
Enforcement actions with similar violations
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Meta - Germany (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: