- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
DSB (Austria) – CJEU Judgment (Austria, 2023)
CJEU judgment — not a DPA enforcement action
This is a Court of Justice ruling, not an enforcement action by a data protection authority. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on a case involving a company that provided creditworthiness information. The court clarified that individuals have the right to receive a complete and faithful copy of their personal data. This ruling reinforces the transparency rights of individuals under GDPR.
What happened
The CJEU clarified the right of individuals to receive a complete and faithful copy of their personal data undergoing processing.
Who was affected
Individuals requesting copies of their personal data were affected by this ruling.
What the authority found
The Court held that the right to a copy of personal data must provide a complete and intelligible reproduction, not just a summary.
Why this matters
This ruling emphasizes the importance of transparency in data processing. Companies must ensure they provide individuals with accurate and complete information about their personal data.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.
Processing notes: authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The controller – CRIF – was a company that provided its client with information concerning the creditworthiness of third parties. The data subject asked the controller to provide them with a copy of their data undergoing processing. The controller replied by submitting a summary with the list of such personal data. In the context of a complaint before the Austrian DPA, the data subject lamented that this was not sufficient. However, the supervisory authority held that the controller did not violate the GDPR. The data subject appealed the DPA decision and the court referred the matter to the CJEU. The preliminary question concerned the scope of the right to a copy of data undergoing processing pursuant to Article 15(3) GDPR. According to the CJEU, the GDPR does not contain any definition of “copy”. However, this word, in its usual meaning, indicates a “faithful reproduction or transcription of an original” in opposition to a “purely general description” of data. The true question, however, was whether Article 15(3) GDPR covers “extracts from documents or even entire documents or extracts from databases”. The copy does not refer to the document as such but to the personal data undergoing processing, which must be complete. The Court stressed that the right to a copy – originally not provided by the data protection directive – aims to enable the data subject to protect their rights and interests under the GDPR. As the protection of data subjects’ rights is the rationale behind the right to a copy (and more in general behind the principle of transparency) a copy of data undergoing processing must reproduce data “fully and faithfully” in a manner that enables the data subject to exercise their rights. In conclusion, the right to a copy under Article 15(3) GDPR entails that data subject must be given a faithful and intelligible reproduction of all their personal data. This may include, to the extent that it is necessary to protect their rights and interests, copies of extracts from documents, entire documents or extracts from databases.
Outcome
CJEU Case
A judgment or Advocate General opinion in a case before the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Related Cases (1)
Other cases involving DSB (Austria) in AT
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. DSB (Austria) - Austria (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: