Magazine publisher – €8,500 Fine (Finland, 2021)

€8,500Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto24 June 2021Finland
final
Fine

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Finnish magazine publisher was fined €8,500 for making unsolicited marketing calls without proper consent. The company required customers to agree to marketing calls when subscribing, which wasn't a valid way to get consent. This case highlights the importance of obtaining clear and voluntary consent for marketing activities.

What happened

The magazine publisher made unsolicited marketing calls using an automated system without valid consent.

Who was affected

Customers who subscribed to the magazine and were subjected to marketing calls without proper consent.

What the authority found

The Finnish DPA found that the magazine publisher violated GDPR by not obtaining valid consent for direct marketing calls.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes the need for businesses to ensure that consent for marketing is clear, specific, and freely given. Companies should review their consent practices to avoid similar fines.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 7(2) GDPR
Art. 12(2) GDPR
Art. 21(2) GDPR
Art. 24(1) GDPR
Art. 28(1) GDPR
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The Finnish DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 8,500 on a magazine publisher. The DPA received four complaints against the magazine publisher for unsolicited telephone advertising.The controller had carried out direct marketing using an automated calling system, without valid consent from the recipients of the calls. Specifically, the controller had obtained the apparent consent for direct marketing when a customer subscribed to a magazine on its website, for example. The subscriber to the magazine was required to accept the terms of the subscription and contract, which included consent to direct marketing. If the consent to direct marketing was not given, the magazine could not be subscribed. The DPA states that the consent and the way it was obtained did not comply with the GDPR. Indeed, the consent was not specifically requested for direct marketing and the consent collected together with the subscription and contract terms did not constitute voluntary consent for the purpose of direct marketing. In addition, it was not possible for data subjects to exercise their right to object due to the fact that the direct marketing calls were made using automated calling systems and the voice bots could not understand specific questions from data subjects about their data. Furthermore, the magazine publisher had commissioned a call center to carry out the advertising campaign and had not regulated its processing activities in a contract on commissioned processing.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for Magazine publisher in FI

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Fine Date

24 June 2021

Authority

Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto

Fine Amount

€8,500

Enforcement Tracker ID

ETid-744

About this data

Data: CMS GDPR Enforcement Tracker
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Magazine publisher - Finland (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: