COLOURCOAT LTD – €152,100 Fine (United Kingdom, 2021)
ColourCoat Ltd made a huge number of unwanted marketing calls to people who had opted out. This behavior led to complaints and a fine from the UK's Information Commissioner's Office. The case highlights the importance of respecting people's preferences when it comes to marketing communications.
What happened
ColourCoat made 969,273 unsolicited marketing calls to subscribers, including those on the opt-out list.
Who was affected
People who received unwanted marketing calls from ColourCoat, many of whom had opted out of such communications.
What the authority found
The Information Commissioner's Office found ColourCoat deliberately violated privacy regulations by making calls to people who had opted out and disguising its identity.
Why this matters
This case shows that companies can face serious penalties for ignoring opt-out requests. Businesses should ensure they have proper systems in place to respect customer preferences.
National Law Articles
Between 1 August 2019 to March 2020 ColourCoat made repeat unsolicited marketing calls to subscribers. These calls resulted in a number of complaints to the ICO, which opened an investigation on 1 June 2020. The ICO found that ColourCoat contravened Regulations 21 and 24 of PECR because * 969,273 connected calls were all made for the purposes of direct marketing as defined by section 122(5) DPA 2018; * Of these calls, 452,811 were made to numbers which had been registered on the opt-out TPS or CTPS Registers, for more than 28 days; * ColourCoat made repeat calls to subscribers who had informed ColourCoat that they did not wish to receive such calls. * ColourCoat used telephone numbers on which the recipients of the calls could not contact ColourCoat, via Caller Line Identities ('CLI's); * ColourCoat used various false company names (including "Homes Advice Bureau", "EcoSolve UK" and "Citizens Advice") and/or did not identify itself. The ICO found that the conditions for the imposition of a monetary penalty under section 55A of the UK's national Data Protection Act, were met. It concluded that the contravention was deliberate, as, among other things, ColourCoat had deliberately sought to disguise its identity to avoid detection, and was aware from previous marketing calls that subscribers no longer wish to receive such calls. It further held that the contravention was serious, as there were multiple breaches of Regulations 21 and 24 PCR over an eight month period, leading to a substantial number of unsolicited direct marketing calls. Calls made were also described by complainants as “rude”, “aggressive” and “abusive”, and made one complainant feel “threatened”
Violations (1)
Non-essential cookies (tracking, advertising) are placed on the user's device before obtaining valid consent.
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for COLOURCOAT LTD in UK
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Similar Cases
Enforcement actions with similar violations
Details
Fine Date
16 June 2021
Authority
Information Commissioner's Office
Fine Amount
€152,100
130,000 GBP
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-3625About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. COLOURCOAT LTD - United Kingdom (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: