Enforcing jurisdiction
Norway · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Komplett Bank ASA – Complaint Upheld (Norway, 2021)

Complaint Upheld
Datatilsynet (Norway)11 November 2021Norway
final
Complaint Upheld

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Komplett Bank ASA sent marketing emails to a person who had previously said they didn't want to receive them. This action violated the person's rights under GDPR, which requires companies to respect such objections. The ruling emphasizes the importance of honoring user preferences in marketing communications.

What happened

Komplett Bank ASA sent direct marketing emails to a person despite their prior objection to such processing.

Who was affected

The person who received the marketing emails from Komplett Bank ASA after opting out of such communications.

What the authority found

The authority found that Komplett Bank ASA unlawfully processed personal data for marketing without a valid legal basis, violating GDPR requirements.

Why this matters

This case highlights the need for companies to respect users' choices regarding marketing communications. Businesses should ensure they have proper consent mechanisms in place to avoid similar issues.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 6(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 12(1) GDPR
Art. 12(3) GDPR
Art. 13(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 13(2)(b) GDPR
Art. 21(3) GDPR
Art. 21(4) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 12(1) GDPR
Art. 12(3) GDPR
Art. 13(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 13(2)(b) GDPR
Art. 21(3) GDPR
Art. 21(4) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 14 April 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, scope corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

A data subject received direct marketing in e-mail from the controller Komplett Bank ASA despite of having previously objected to such processing pursuant to Article 21(3) GDPR. The controller's privacy statement and on-line customer portal suggested the lawful basis used for the direct marketing was «Consent» pursuant to Article 6(1)(a) GDPR. The data subject had at no point given consent for processing of his personal information for direct marketing purposes. Communication between the data subject and the controller's data privacy officer eventually revealed that the controller was using another lawful basis for this processing, specifically «Necessary for the performance of a contract» pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) GDPR. The contract in question regarded a credit card service bundled with a non-optional customer benefit / loyalty program. While the customer benefit program part of the contract did contain a clause stating the controller would send direct marketing to its customers, the data subject considered that such marketing activity could not be considered objectively necessary for the performance of the contract. The responses from the controller's data privacy officer to the data subject's requests for information did on multiple occasions exceed the maximum time limit of 30 days pursuant to Article 12(3) GDPR. The DPA held that Komplett Bank ASA had: * violated Article 6(1) GDPR by processing personal data for direct marketing purposes without a lawful basis. The DPA held that main subject-matter of the contract was the issuance of a credit card, not direct marketing, and that the controller's use of Article 6(1)(b) GDPR «Necessary for the performance of a contract» was unlawful. * violated Articles 12(1) and 13(1) GDPR by providing misleading information about the lawful basis used for processing of personal data for direct marketing purposes. * violated Article 12(3) GDPR by exceeding the time limit for responding to the data subjects requests for information. * violated Articles 13(2) and 21(4) GDPR by not making the data subject aware of his right to object to the processing of his personal data for direct marketing purposes. * violated Article 21(3) GDPR by not respecting the data subject's prior objection to direct marketing. For the above violations, the DPA issued Komplett Bank ASA a Compliance Order and Reprimand.

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for Komplett Bank ASA in NO

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

11 November 2021

Authority

Datatilsynet (Norway)

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-4630

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Komplett Bank ASA - Norway (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: