Google LLC – Dismissed (Italy, 2022)

Dismissed
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali9 June 2022Italy
final
ePrivacy
Dismissed

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Google faced a complaint after a person asked them to remove links to articles about a past legal case. The Italian data protection authority ruled that the articles were still relevant and should not be removed. This decision highlights the balance between personal privacy and public interest in information.

What happened

A person requested Google to remove links to articles about their past legal issues.

Who was affected

The individual who was involved in a criminal investigation and sought to have articles about them removed from search results.

What the authority found

The authority decided that the articles were still relevant and in the public interest, so they did not need to be removed.

Why this matters

This ruling shows that even when individuals want to erase past information, authorities may prioritize public interest. Companies should be cautious about how they handle requests for content removal.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 17(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 17(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 21(1) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

National Law Articles

AI-identified

Art. 77 GDPR
Source verified 10 April 2026
articles corrected
national law identified
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The controller is Google LLC. The data subject was involved in a number legal matters. Articles were published about these legal matters, which were found in search results in association with the data subject's name. The data subject asked the DPA to order the controller to remove these URLs, exercising his right to be forgotten (Article 17(1) GDPR). The data subject claimed that the court proceedings were fully settled, resulting in an acquittal. Furthermore, he stated that they were outdated. The data subject therefore argued that there was thus no public interest concerning the right to freedom of information and journalism with regard to this articles. The Controller stated that there was a public interest in the articles, as they related to conduct of serious criminal relevance committed by the data subject and in respect of which 'the outcome of the trial is unclear.' The DPA found that, other than the data subject argued, the acquittal only related to a part of the charges. Furthermore, the articles in question also referred to other allegations against the data subject, in respect of which the judicial proceedings had not yet been concluded. Therefore the DPA held that the information in the articles were still relevant and in the public interest. The DPA held that the complaint was unfounded.

Outcome

Dismissed

The complaint or investigation was dismissed.

Violations (1)

Unclear Cookie Information
high

The cookie banner or cookie policy provides vague, incomplete, or unclear information about what cookies are used and why.

Art. 12, 13 GDPR

Details

Decision Date

9 June 2022

Authority

Garante per la protezione dei dati personali

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-5071

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Google LLC - Italy (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: