Google LLC – Dismissed (Italy, 2022)

Dismissed
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali9 June 2022Italy
final
ePrivacy
Dismissed

Google LLC's request to remove links related to a person's past legal issues was dismissed by the Italian data protection authority. This ruling is important because it shows that public interest can outweigh individual privacy rights in certain cases.

What happened

A data subject asked Google to remove URLs related to their past legal matters, claiming they were outdated.

Who was affected

The individual involved in the legal matters was affected by the decision.

What the authority found

The DPA ruled that the information was still relevant and in the public interest, thus denying the request to remove the links.

Why this matters

This case illustrates the balance between privacy and public interest, reminding individuals and companies that not all requests for data removal will be granted.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 17(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 21(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 17(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 21(1) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Source verified 10 April 2026
articles corrected
national law identified
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The controller is Google LLC. The data subject was involved in a number legal matters. Articles were published about these legal matters, which were found in search results in association with the data subject's name. The data subject asked the DPA to order the controller to remove these URLs, exercising his right to be forgotten (Article 17(1) GDPR). The data subject claimed that the court proceedings were fully settled, resulting in an acquittal. Furthermore, he stated that they were outdated. The data subject therefore argued that there was thus no public interest concerning the right to freedom of information and journalism with regard to this articles. The Controller stated that there was a public interest in the articles, as they related to conduct of serious criminal relevance committed by the data subject and in respect of which 'the outcome of the trial is unclear.' The DPA found that, other than the data subject argued, the acquittal only related to a part of the charges. Furthermore, the articles in question also referred to other allegations against the data subject, in respect of which the judicial proceedings had not yet been concluded. Therefore the DPA held that the information in the articles were still relevant and in the public interest. The DPA held that the complaint was unfounded.

Outcome

Dismissed

The complaint or investigation was dismissed.

Violations (1)

Unclear Cookie Information
high

The cookie banner or cookie policy provides vague, incomplete, or unclear information about what cookies are used and why.

Art. 12, 13 GDPR

Details

Decision Date

9 June 2022

Authority

Garante per la protezione dei dati personali

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-5071

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Google LLC - Italy (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: