Google LLC – Dismissed (Italy, 2022)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
Google faced a complaint after a person asked them to remove links to articles about a past legal case. The Italian data protection authority ruled that the articles were still relevant and should not be removed. This decision highlights the balance between personal privacy and public interest in information.
What happened
A person requested Google to remove links to articles about their past legal issues.
Who was affected
The individual who was involved in a criminal investigation and sought to have articles about them removed from search results.
What the authority found
The authority decided that the articles were still relevant and in the public interest, so they did not need to be removed.
Why this matters
This ruling shows that even when individuals want to erase past information, authorities may prioritize public interest. Companies should be cautious about how they handle requests for content removal.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
National Law Articles
The controller is Google LLC. The data subject was involved in a number legal matters. Articles were published about these legal matters, which were found in search results in association with the data subject's name. The data subject asked the DPA to order the controller to remove these URLs, exercising his right to be forgotten (Article 17(1) GDPR). The data subject claimed that the court proceedings were fully settled, resulting in an acquittal. Furthermore, he stated that they were outdated. The data subject therefore argued that there was thus no public interest concerning the right to freedom of information and journalism with regard to this articles. The Controller stated that there was a public interest in the articles, as they related to conduct of serious criminal relevance committed by the data subject and in respect of which 'the outcome of the trial is unclear.' The DPA found that, other than the data subject argued, the acquittal only related to a part of the charges. Furthermore, the articles in question also referred to other allegations against the data subject, in respect of which the judicial proceedings had not yet been concluded. Therefore the DPA held that the information in the articles were still relevant and in the public interest. The DPA held that the complaint was unfounded.
Outcome
Dismissed
The complaint or investigation was dismissed.
Violations (1)
The cookie banner or cookie policy provides vague, incomplete, or unclear information about what cookies are used and why.
Art. 12, 13 GDPR
Related Enforcement Actions (1)
Other enforcement actions involving Google LLC in IT
Similar Cases
Enforcement actions with similar violations
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Google LLC - Italy (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: