- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Spain · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- No confirmed legal basis recorded.
- Privacy topics
D.A.A.A – €18,000 Fine (Spain, 2019)
The Spanish data protection authority fined Vueling Airlines for using pre-ticked boxes that made it hard for users to reject cookies. This is important because it shows that companies must get clear consent before using non-essential cookies. Businesses should avoid pre-ticked options to comply with consent rules.
What happened
Vueling Airlines used pre-ticked boxes for cookie consent, making it difficult for users to reject non-essential cookies.
Who was affected
Customers trying to purchase airline tickets from Vueling Airlines' website.
What the authority found
The authority found that Vueling's use of pre-ticked boxes violated Spanish law requiring clear consent for non-essential cookies.
Why this matters
This case highlights the need for clear and active consent mechanisms. Companies should ensure their cookie policies allow users to easily opt-out.
Entities Involved
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 5 April 2026.
Processing notes: national law identified.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The data subject complained to the DPA that it was impossible to purchase an airline ticket from the controller's website without accepting cookies and consenting to receive advertisements. The controller, Vueling Airlines S.A., had a box in its checkout procedure indicating consent to receive ads, but, contrary to the data subject's complaint, it was possible to purchase a ticket without checking the box. The controller's cookie policy allowed users to revoke consent to non-essential cookies by unchecking two pre-ticked boxes, one for "performance cookies" and one for "targeted cookies." However, some third-party cookies were incorrectly categorized as essential, so even when users unchecked the relevant boxes or clicked "reject all," non-essential cookies remained. The DPA found that the controller's consent banner violated Article 22.2 of the Spanish Law on Services of the Information Society and Electronic Commerce (Ley 34/2002, de 11 de julio, de servicios de la sociedad de la información y de comercio electrónico - LSSI) which requires service providers to obtain consent before installing non-essential cookies. The use of pre-ticked boxes is not a valid basis for consent, and the impossibility to reject cookies miscategorized as essential is not legal either. For these violations, the DPA ultimately fined the controller €18,000; an inital €30,000 fine was reduced by 40% because the controller voluntarily acknowledged responsibility for the infractions and agreed to pay the fine before final resolution of the sanctioning procedure.
Violations (2)
Cookie consent checkboxes are pre-selected by default, violating the requirement for active, affirmative consent.
Tracking cookies remain active or are re-placed even after the user explicitly rejects them.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for D.A.A.A in ES
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Similar Cases
Enforcement actions with similar violations
Details
Fine Date
6 October 2019
Authority
Agencia Española de Protección de Datos
Fine Amount
€18,000
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-5002About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. D.A.A.A - Spain (2019). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: