VOODOO (the controller) – €3,000,000 Fine (France, 2022)

€3,000,000Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés29 December 2022France
final
ePrivacy
Fine

VOODOO, a mobile game developer, was fined €3 million for not getting users' consent before placing tracking cookies on their devices. This matters because it shows that companies must be clear and honest about how they track users online.

What happened

VOODOO placed tracking cookies on users' devices without obtaining consent first.

Who was affected

Mobile app users who downloaded and opened VOODOO's games were affected.

What the authority found

The French DPA ruled that VOODOO violated ePrivacy rules by making it harder for users to reject tracking cookies than to accept them.

Why this matters

This case highlights the importance of user consent for tracking and sets a precedent for stricter enforcement of cookie regulations. Other app developers should ensure their consent processes are transparent and user-friendly.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 5(3) ePrivacy Directive GDPR
Art. 82 Loi Informatique et Libertés GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 82 Loi Informatique et Libertés
Art. 5(3) ePrivacy Directive

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

National Law Articles

AI-identified

Article 82 Loi Informatiques et Libertés
Source verified 2 April 2026
articles corrected
national law identified
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

VOODOO ('provider') was a mobile game developer. The investigation service of the French DPA (the investigation service) carried out several checks on voodoo.io and on several of the provider's mobile applications on iOS, in particular to check cookies and trackers deposited on user devices. The investigation service followed the path of a user who downloaded one of the provider's apps and opened the application for the first time. The user would be presented with a window, designed by APPLE, called "App Tracking Transparency" (hereinafter "the first window"). The purpose of this first window was to obtain consent from the user to let the provider track the user's activities on the provider's applications. The user had two options in the first window, either to accept tracking by the provider or to decline it. Whatever option the data subject would choose, a second window, designed by the provider, would show up after the first window. In this second window, the user only had to certify that they were over the age of sixteen. Also, the user had to accept the provider’s personal data protection policy. When the user clicked on "Ask the app not to track my activities" in the first window, the second window would contain a text indicating that the user's iPhone settings prevented “tracking for the purpose of personalising ads and advertisements based on your device's advertising ID". The controller also stated in this second window that "Data protection is a key issue for Voodoo and we respect your choice." The DPA noted that in this scenario, the IDFA, APPLE's own advertising identifier, was not read but replaced by a string of zeros. Therefore, the provider would not be able to read this identifier. However, the DPA found that in this scenario, another cookie called 'the IDFV' was read by the provider for advertising purposes. The IDFV ("Identifier For Vendors") was a cookie provided by Apple to the publisher of an app in the Apple App store. This cookie allow

Violations (5)

No Reject Button
critical

Cookie banner does not provide a clear reject/refuse all button at the same level as the accept button.

Art. 7 GDPR

Reject Harder Than Accept
critical

Refusing cookies requires more clicks or steps than accepting them, or the reject option is less visually prominent.

Art. 7 GDPR

Cookies Placed Before Consent
critical

Non-essential cookies (tracking, advertising) are placed on the user's device before obtaining valid consent.

Art. 6(1) GDPR

Cookies Persist After Rejection
critical

Tracking cookies remain active or are re-placed even after the user explicitly rejects them.

Art. 6(1) GDPR

Misleading Banner Messaging
critical

The cookie banner uses misleading language to trick or pressure users into accepting cookies (dark patterns).

Art. 7 GDPR

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for VOODOO (the controller) in FR

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Similar Cases

Enforcement actions with similar violations

Details

Fine Date

29 December 2022

Authority

Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés

Fine Amount

€3,000,000

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-5636

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified
Cookie relevance: 100%

Cite as: Cookie Fines. VOODOO (the controller) - France (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: