- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Italy · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
XX (the data subject) – Complaint Upheld (Italy, 2023)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An Italian politician successfully requested Google to remove links to old articles about his political career. The data protection authority agreed that the information was no longer in the public interest, showing the importance of personal privacy online.
What happened
The Italian DPA ordered Google to remove certain URLs linking to articles about a former politician.
Who was affected
The former politician, whose name was associated with the articles, was affected.
What the authority found
The authority decided that the indexing of the articles was no longer necessary for public interest, allowing for their removal.
Why this matters
This case highlights the right to be forgotten and the balance between public interest and personal privacy. It encourages individuals to seek removal of outdated or irrelevant information online.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Entities Involved
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 11 April 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
A former politician (the data subject) asked Google LLC (the controller) to remove a number of URLs associated with his name and which linked to articles containing information relating to his political commitment. As a matter of fact, he believed that considerable time passed and such disclosure of personal data was no longer in the public interest. On 5 May 2021, the data subject filed a complaint with the Italian DPA, requesting the controller to remove the content and alleging the damage suffered by his personal and professional reputation as a result of the long-standing online availability of such information. The data subject stressed that no legal action was undertaken against him because of the facts described in the publication and that his political career ended five years before the erasure request. The controller claimed that it failed to identify the name of the data subject on the page relating to one of the URLs concerned. As result, it only adopted manual measures to prevent the publication from appearing among the results associated with that name. Concerning the other URLs, the controller argued that it was not able to comply with the data subject's request, given that those were contents linked to the political role he played at the time of publication. More specifically, they related to a video where the data subject tried to persuade voters to vote for the party to which he belonged. The data subject made that video during his electoral campaign and deliberately published it for the purpose of public sharing. These circumstances, therefore, determined the existence of an interest of the public to have knowledge of it. Moreover, the controller argued that although the data subject did not currently hold political office, he nevertheless played a public role as a businessman. The DPA held that because the name of the data subject was not specified in the first URL link mentioned, there was no reason to take measures in this regard. However, with regard to the other URLs, the DPA considered that the contents concerned statements made by the data subject during political elections occurred almost ten years before. Moreover, the data subject did not hold political office for five years. Thus, the DPA held that there was no specific necessity to preserve the indexing of those contents on Google. Therefore, the Italian DPA ordered the controller to remove the URLs as search results that could be found in association with the name of the data subject and gave the controller twenty days to remedy to the situation, pursuant to Article 58(2)(c) and Article 58(2)(g) GDPR.
Outcome
Complaint Upheld
A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.
Related Enforcement Actions (1)
Other enforcement actions involving XX (the data subject) in IT
Details
Decision Date
11 January 2023
Authority
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-5760About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. XX (the data subject) - Italy (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: