Comune di Siracusa – €5,000 Fine (Italy, 2024)

€5,000Garante per la protezione dei dati personali11 January 2024Italy
final
ePrivacy
Fine

The Municipality of Siracusa was fined for not properly designating a Data Protection Officer (DPO) and failing to communicate their contact details. This is significant because it shows that even public entities must follow data protection laws, which helps protect citizens' personal information.

What happened

The Municipality of Siracusa was fined for not designating a Data Protection Officer and failing to provide their contact details to the authorities.

Who was affected

The residents of Siracusa who rely on the municipality to protect their personal data were affected.

What the authority found

The authority found that the municipality violated GDPR by not having a designated DPO and not sharing their contact information as required.

Why this matters

This ruling underscores the importance of compliance with data protection laws for all organizations, including public entities. It encourages businesses to ensure they have the necessary data protection measures in place.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 37(7) GDPR
Art. 58(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 58(2) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 37(7) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Source verified 6 April 2026
verified correct
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The Italian DPA conducted an investigation into the compliance of the Municipality of Siracusa (the controller) with data protection laws, pursuant to Article 58(1)(b) GDPR. During the investigation, it was discovered that the controller had failed to fulfil its obligation to designate a DPO and communicate their contact details to the DPA. Considering the findings, the DPA informed the controller of the start of a sanctioning procedure under Article 58(2) GDPR. The DPA also invited the controller to provide its defence in writing. The Italian DPA noted that Article 37(7) GDPR not only mandates the controller to publish the contact details of the DPO but also to communicate them to the DPA. Furthermore, it cited the “[https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/items/612048/en Guidelines on Data Protection Officers]”, adopted by the Article 29 Working Party, which outline the requirements for designating a DPO and communicating their contact details to the DPA. The Italian DPA even established in another [https://www.garanteprivacy.it/web/guest/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/docweb/9589467 document] the dedicated online procedure for entities to use in communicating the DPO's contact details. This procedure served as the solely authorised channel for such communications and was designed to ensure the efficient and secure transfer of information between entities and the DPA. Therefore, although the controller had published the contact details of the DPOs on its website, it had not officially communicated this information via established procedures to the DPA, violating Article 37(7) GDPR. The controller's attempts to rectify the situation, such as contacting the DPA by phone and submitting the contact details of the DPOs through the designated online form, were deemed insufficient by the DPA since the details were provided after the start of the proceedings. As a consequence, the DPA imposed a pecuniary administrative sanction of €5,000 on the controller for its failur

Violations (1)

Cookies Placed Before Consent
critical

Non-essential cookies (tracking, advertising) are placed on the user's device before obtaining valid consent.

Art. 6(1) GDPR

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for Comune di Siracusa in IT

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Fine Date

11 January 2024

Authority

Garante per la protezione dei dati personali

Fine Amount

€5,000

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-7588

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Comune di Siracusa - Italy (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: