Enforcing jurisdiction
France · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
No confirmed legal basis recorded.
Privacy topics

Orange – €50,000,000 Fine (France, 2024)

€50,000,000Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés14 November 2024France
final
ePrivacy
Fine

The French data protection authority fined Orange €50 million for continuing to use cookies after users rejected them. This case matters because it shows that companies must respect user consent regarding cookies. Other businesses should review their cookie practices to avoid similar penalties.

What happened

Orange was fined for allowing cookies to persist on user devices even after consent was withdrawn.

Who was affected

The users of Orange's email service, who were subjected to unwanted advertising emails due to cookie misuse, were affected.

What the authority found

The authority ruled that Orange violated ePrivacy laws by not properly managing cookie consent.

Why this matters

This fine underscores the need for strict compliance with consent requirements for cookies. Companies must ensure they have effective systems to manage user consent to avoid hefty fines.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Article 82 Loi n° 78-17
L. 34-5 CPCE

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Review needed — 2 April 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, date discrepancy.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

Among other services, the respondent provides an e-mail service called “Mail Orange” to more than 7,800,000 users and is the leading telecommunications operator in France. In an ex-officio investigation, the French Data Protection Commission (Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés – CNIL) found the following: Between the 7 and 12 June 2023, users were confronted with advertisements which were displayed like regular e-mails in their inboxes. The only recorded difference to regular emails was that the advertisements appeared in a light grey colour, included the word “publicité” and a cross to delete the email instantly. In addition, it was found that the respondent operated cookies on user devices if they had agreed to this. The respondent's argument The respondent argued that the CNIL up until now has always placed the responsibility of obtaining data subject’s consent to advertising on the advertiser. It therefore, did not see itself responsible for obtaining consent as it merely transferred the email of the advertiser to the data subject, just like regular emails. It further explained that it used a system which allowed it to disseminate the advertising emails without processing the data subject’s email address. Operation of cookies When users withdrew their consent to the placement of cookies on their device, the cookies which had previously been activated continued to function. Here the respondent argued that the data collected through the cookies after consent had been withdrawn was not then further processed by the respondent. Requirement of consent The CNIL based its decision on the CJEU judgment C-102/20 which showed that e-mails which are displayed in a space normally used for private e-mails containing promotional content, constitute direct marketing which in turn requires the data subject’s consent. Therefore, the CNIL concluded that in this case as per [https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000042155961/ Article L. 34-5 Postal and Electronic Communications Code (Code des postes et des communications électroniques – CPCE]) which partly transposes the e-privacy Directive into French law, the users consent to these marketing emails was necessary. Liability of the respondent The CNIL held that the respondent as the provider of the email service strategically markets spaces in the inbox of its users to advertisers. Since the respondent determines the display of these emails, the respondent is the only one in direct contact with the recipients of the emails. Therefore, it is the only entity, which could have obtained the recipients consent and which made the CNIL declare the respondent as the controller. Cookies The CNIL held that the persistent functioning of cookies after user consent had been withdrawn is expressly prohibited by [https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/article_lc/LEGIARTI000037813978 Article 82 of the Informatics and Freedoms Act (Loi Informatique et Libertés] - Loi n78-17), a French Act providing for data protection rights. The CNIL stated that it was irrelevant whether the extracted data was then subject to further processing by the respondent. The mere reading of the cookie data fell under the prohibition detailed in Article 82 of Loi n78-17. Administrative fine For the breach of Article 82 of Loi n78-17 and Article L. 34-5 CPCE, the CNIL issued a fine of €50,000,000 based on the respondent’s annual turnover. The CNIL further issued an order to cease the unlawful operation of cookies within three months. A penalty of €100,000 per day must be paid by the respondent in case of delay.

Violations (1)

Cookies Persist After Rejection
critical

Tracking cookies remain active or are re-placed even after the user explicitly rejects them.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for Orange in FR

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Fine Date

14 November 2024

Authority

Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés

Fine Amount

€50,000,000

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-8664

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified
Cookie relevance: 100%

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Orange - France (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: