CALOGA – €80,000 Fine (France, 2025)

€80,000Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés15 May 2025France
final
ePrivacy
Fine

CALOGA was fined €80,000 for using misleading consent forms that made it hard for users to opt out of data sharing. The company used dark patterns to manipulate consent choices, which is against data protection rules. This case shows that businesses must be transparent and fair in how they obtain consent.

What happened

CALOGA used misleading forms that made it easier for users to accept data sharing than to refuse it.

Who was affected

Individuals who interacted with CALOGA's consent forms and had their data used for marketing.

What the authority found

The French data protection authority found that CALOGA violated GDPR by using dark patterns and not allowing easy withdrawal of consent.

Why this matters

This ruling serves as a warning to businesses about the importance of clear and fair consent practices. Companies should avoid manipulative tactics and ensure users can easily manage their consent.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 7(GDPR)
Art. 5(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 7(3) GDPR
Art. 4(11) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 4(11) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 7(3) GDPR
Art. 32(GDPR)

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

National Law Articles

AI-identified

Art. L.34-5 CPCE
Source verified 3 April 2026
articles corrected
national law identified
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

CALOGA (the controller) is a company that carries out commercial marketing operations, as well as acting as a data broker. The controller organizes its processing in four databases. One of the services the controller offered was to carry out e-mail marketing campaigns on behalf of companies. To do this, the controller used data collected by data brokers through entry forms for game contests or online product tests. These forms were misleading because the buttons to accept the use of data subjects’ data was much more prominent than those to reject it (this is also known as dark patterns). The controller relied on prior consent given for the initial collectors, and did not allow the data subject to withdraw consent as easily as they had given it. The DPA carried out an on-the-spot investigation of the company in 2022. On June 2024, the DPA rapporteur informed the controller of its breaches of Articles 5(1)(e), 6(1)(a) and 32 GDPR. The controller responded with two arguments- first, it could not foresee that the DPA’s conclusions, as there were no specific recommendations on direct marketing at the time of the inspection. The controller also argued that it had no role in obtaining consent when the data was first collected, and that the contractual and verification measures for the data collected were sufficient. The DPA considered that CALOGA acted as a joint controller for the purposes of transmitting the data to partners (these partners were considered joint controllers). The DPA first dismissed the controller’s foreseeability argument, stating there were rules applicable to direct marketing and consent for several years, and the recommendations on consent through cookies can serve as a guideline for general collection of consent. The DPA also considered the contractual and verifications measures taken by the controller as insufficient. According to Article 7 GDPR, the controller must prove that the data subject has consented to the data processing concerning th

Violations (4)

Reject Harder Than Accept
critical

Refusing cookies requires more clicks or steps than accepting them, or the reject option is less visually prominent.

Art. 7 GDPR

Cookies Placed Before Consent
critical

Non-essential cookies (tracking, advertising) are placed on the user's device before obtaining valid consent.

Art. 6(1) GDPR

Misleading Banner Messaging
critical

The cookie banner uses misleading language to trick or pressure users into accepting cookies (dark patterns).

Art. 7 GDPR

Cannot Withdraw Cookie Consent
critical

No accessible mechanism exists for users to withdraw previously given cookie consent.

Art. 7(3) GDPR

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for CALOGA in FR

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Fine Date

15 May 2025

Authority

Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés

Fine Amount

€80,000

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-9300

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified
Cookie relevance: 80%

Cite as: Cookie Fines. CALOGA - France (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: