- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Trade association – Court Ruling (Germany, 2020)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A trade association took legal action against a seller on eBay for not providing information about how personal data would be used. This matters because it highlights the need for transparency in online transactions.
What happened
The court ruled that the seller did not provide required information about data processing on their eBay listing.
Who was affected
Potential buyers of the seller's products were affected by the lack of information.
What the authority found
The court found that the absence of required information violated the law and made the seller's offer inadmissible.
Why this matters
This ruling emphasizes the importance of transparency for online sellers. It shows that failing to provide necessary information can lead to legal consequences.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Archived or cached source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 11 April 2026.
Processing notes: national law identified.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The defendant had offered tires for instant purchase on the website eBay where he had not provided potential buyers with information about the processing of their personal data in case of a purchase according to Article 13 GDPR. Therefore, the plaintiff, as representative trade-association of those potential buyers, lodged a complaint with the competent jurisdiction, demanding that the defendant be summoned to provide the missing information since the sell was otherwise to be considered inadmissible. Is the absence of information, such as required by Article 13 GDPR, to be considered as an unfair trade-base action, making the offer inadmissible in accordance with § 3 UWG (national law against unfair competition)? After admitting the right of action of the plaintiff as representative association of consumers’ rights, the Court points out that the absence of information of Article 13 GDPR constitutes a violation of the law and, as such, an unfair trade-base action as understood by § 3 of the national law against unfair competition (UWG). As long as the defendant does not provide the missing information, the offer is therefore to be considered as inadmissible.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Trade association in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Trade association - Germany (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: