unknown (claimant) – Court Ruling (Austria, 2021)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An Austrian court ruled that a company unlawfully processed a person's presumed political opinions by classifying them based on data. This case matters because it shows that companies must be careful when handling personal data, especially regarding sensitive topics like political beliefs.
What happened
The court found that the company had improperly assigned political affinities to individuals without their consent.
Who was affected
The claimant, who was classified as likely interested in a far-right political party based on their data.
What the authority found
The court decided that the company did not have a valid legal basis for processing the claimant's data regarding political opinions.
Why this matters
This case underscores the need for companies to respect individuals' privacy and avoid making assumptions about their political beliefs. Businesses should review their data practices to ensure compliance with privacy laws.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
National Law Articles
The defendant conducts (i.a.) business as an address publisher under § 151 Austrian Trade Regulation Act (Gewerbeordnung 1994 - GewO) and sells personal data for third-party marketing purposes. Starting in 2017, the defendant had created information on the presumed "affinities for political parties" of the entire Austrian population. This was done by gathering and combining information from anonymized polls and statistics on election results via an algorithm. As a result, individuals were assigned to one or more marketing groups and classifications regarding political affinity depending on their place of residence, age, gender, etc. The defendant had (i.a.) assessed that the claimant was likely to be interested in the far-right Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ). After the claimant had learned this (following an access request under Article 15 GDPR), he filed a lawsuit against the defendant. He requested (i) an injunction that the defendant had to refrain from processing data on his presumed political opinions and (ii) € 1,000 in damages since he considered the alleged affinity to the FPÖ an insult, shameful and highly damaging to credit. The defendant had not disclosed the claimant's data to third parties. By 04.06.2019, the defendant had erased all data on "affinities for political parties", including those of the claimant. Throughout all court instances, the defendant argued that data on the "affinity for a political party" do not qualify as personal data, let alone special categories of personal data. The first-instance court (Landesgerichts für Zivilrechtssachen Wien) upheld the request for an injunction but rejected the request for damages, stating that the threshold for compensable immaterial damage had not been reached. The second-instance court (Oberlandesgericht Wien) confirmed this judgment. Both claimant and defendant appealed against this decision: the claimant appealed against the rejection of his request for damages, the defendant against the injunction to
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (1)
Other cases involving unknown (claimant) in AT
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. unknown (claimant) - Austria (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: