Open Rights Group – Court Ruling (United Kingdom, 2021)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
The High Court in the UK dismissed a challenge against the immigration exemption in data protection law. The court found that this exemption did not violate privacy rights as claimed. This ruling is significant for organizations dealing with personal data in immigration contexts.
What happened
The Open Rights Group and The3million challenged the legality of the immigration exemption in the Data Protection Act 2018.
Who was affected
Individuals affected by the immigration exemption who are concerned about their privacy rights.
What the authority found
The court upheld the immigration exemption, stating it did not conflict with GDPR privacy rights.
Why this matters
This ruling clarifies the legal standing of immigration-related data processing and reinforces the need for organizations to understand how exemptions can impact privacy rights.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
National Law Articles
The two claimants are The Open Rights Group and The3million, who are respectively a UK-based digital campaigning organisation working to protect the rights to privacy and free speech online and an organisation campaigning for EU citizens in the UK. In August 2018, they brought a judicial review claim against the lawfulness of the immigration exemption in paragraph 4, Schedule 2, of the Data Protection Act 2018 ('DPA 2018'), which was brought into force on 25 May 2018 ('Immigration Exemption'). They argued that the Immigration Exemption is contrary to Article 23 GDPR and incompatible with the rights guaranteed by Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU. [https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2019/2562.html The High Court (Admin) judge dismissed these claims]. The claimants appealed this decision, which [https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2021/800.html the EWCA allowed in May 2020]. At this stage of the appeal, it held the “Immigration Exemption” was indeed contrary to Article 23 GDPR. It nonetheless did not decide what form of relief should be granted at that stage, because this issue raised legal issues that needed to be carefully assessed in separate proceedings. As such, the decision on relief was deferred to this case. To decide what form of relief it should grant the claimants, the EWCA first analysed whether it (1) had jurisdiction to suspend relief for a period of time and, if so (2) whether/to what extent/for how long it should exercise it. = The EWCA first stated that the UK GDPR is retained EU law and therefore has supremacy over domestic primary legislation. It nonetheless explained that this does not entitle the court "to make a quashing order in respect of primary legislation", as this would be constitutionally improper, but only to "make a declaratory judgment or order". It summarised the test to be followed, which essentially mirrors the provisions in [https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/16/section/6 sectio
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Open Rights Group in UK
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Open Rights Group - United Kingdom (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: