- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
WetterOnline Meteorologische Services GmbH – Court Ruling (Germany, 2024)
A German court ruled that WetterOnline must change its cookie banner because it did not allow users to easily reject cookies. This matters because clear consent is essential for user privacy. Companies need to ensure their cookie banners are user-friendly and comply with regulations.
What happened
WetterOnline's cookie banner lacked a clear option for users to reject non-essential cookies.
Who was affected
Website visitors who interacted with WetterOnline's cookie banner were affected.
What the authority found
The court decided that the cookie banner design did not meet GDPR requirements for clear and informed consent.
Why this matters
This case sets a precedent for cookie consent practices, reminding companies that user consent must be easy to understand and access. It highlights the ongoing scrutiny of online privacy practices.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 11 April 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The North Rhine Westphalia Consumer Protection Association ([https://www.verbraucherzentrale.nrw/ Verbraucherzentrale NRW]) claimed for an injunction against the use of cookie banners on [https://www.wetteronline.de/ wetteronline.de], a wesite operated by WetterOnline Meteorologische Services GmbH, the controller. The controller used a cookie banner to collect users' consent to not necessary cookies without providing a reject option on the first layer. The data subject could only refuse to give consent by clicking on the “Settings” button to reach the second layer, where they then had an “Accept all” button or a “Save” button. The cookie banner also had an “Accept & Close X” button in the top-right corner, on both first and second level. In a judgement dated 4 May 2023, the Regional Court of Cologne (Landgericht Köln, LG Köln) dismissed the action as it considered the claim of the Association to be too broad and claimed that it could not impose a specific cookie banner design on the controller. The Association appealed against this judgement to the Higher Regional Court of Cologne (Oberlandesgericht Köln, OLG Köln) and specified its claim. Firstly, the OLG Köln considered that the controller designed their cookie banner without an equivalent "reject option" either at the first or second layer. The OLG pointed out that the average user does not realise what the “Save” button represents - namely refusal to provide consent for the use of not necessary cookies. Therefore, the OLG decided that consent could not be regarded as freely given and sufficiently informed under Article 4(11) GDPR. Secondly, regarding the “Accept & Close X” button, the OLG considered that the “X” symbol is known to users as a way to close a window, but not to consent to the use of cookies. The average user would not be aware that this constitutes consent, even if the “Accept & Close” is located directly next to the “X” symbol. The OLG also noted that it was not easy for data subjects to recognize that the “Accept & Close” and the “X” symbol were one and the same button. Therefore, the OLG considered that this could not be regarded as unambiguous under Article 4(11) GDPR. With regard to these infringements, the OLG therefore ordered the controller to refrain from using such a cookie banner design and make sure that the banner includes a reject option equivalent to the accept option.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Violations (1)
Cookie banner does not provide a clear reject/refuse all button at the same level as the accept button.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for WetterOnline Meteorologische Services GmbH in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. WetterOnline Meteorologische Services GmbH - Germany (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: