IAB Europe – Court Ruling (Belgium, 2025)

Court Ruling
Autorité de Protection des Données14 May 2025Belgium
final
ePrivacy
Court Ruling

IAB Europe faced a ruling for not providing clear cookie consent options on its website. The court found that users were misled about their choices regarding cookies, which is important for protecting user privacy. Companies should ensure their cookie consent mechanisms are transparent and user-friendly.

What happened

IAB Europe did not provide a clear option to reject cookies or offer granular choices for users when they visited its website.

Who was affected

Internet users visiting IAB Europe's website who were subjected to unclear cookie consent practices.

What the authority found

The Belgian Data Protection Authority ruled that IAB Europe violated multiple GDPR articles by failing to provide adequate cookie consent options and information.

Why this matters

This case sets a precedent for cookie consent practices in the digital advertising industry. Companies must improve their consent mechanisms to comply with data protection laws.

GDPR Articles Cited
Automatically processed
Art. 6(GDPR)
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 14(GDPR)
Art. 24(GDPR)
Art. 25(GDPR)
Art. 30(GDPR)
Art. 32(GDPR)
Art. 35(GDPR)
Art. 37(GDPR)
Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 4(2) GDPR
Art. 4(7) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(f) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 4(2) GDPR
Art. 4(7) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 6(GDPR)
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 14(GDPR)
Art. 24(GDPR)
Art. 25(GDPR)
Art. 30(GDPR)
Art. 32(GDPR)
Art. 35(GDPR)
Art. 37(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityHof van Beroep
Reviewed AuthorityAPD/GBA (Belgium)

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Review needed — 9 April 2026.

Processing notes: amount discrepancy, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

IAB Europe (“IAB”, short of Interactive Advertising Bureau) is an association of undertakings active in the field of digital advertising such as publishers, ecommerce and marketing companies and intermediaries, including major international players such as Microsoft and Google. IAB is established in Belgium and operates on a European level. IAB developed the “Transparency & Consent Framework” (“TCF”). The purpose of the TCF is to make the processing of personal data for online advertising compliant with data protection requirements. To this end, the TCF provides a set of technical standards and rules (in the form of contractual obligations) for companies in the sector. In particular, the TCF specifies how publishers, advertisers, and intermediaries should use the OpenRTB protocol, a widely used Real Time Bidding (“RTB”) system. RTB consists in the instant and automated online auction of users profiles for the purpose of selling and purchasing advertising space online. When an internet user visits a webpage where advertising space is available, the server sends the user’s data to a platform where advertisers automatically and instantly place bids. Advertisers place their bids based on some characteristics of individual users visiting the page (such as their location, marketing profiles, and browsing history). The bid winner displays their customer's advertising in that specific advertising space. The whole process involves a mass exchange of personal data. For this operation to be possible, users are (in principle) asked to express their advertising preferences when they first visit a publisher’s website. These preferences are collected by websites (more specifically, by each website's Consent Management Platform) and stored in a string called Transparency and Consent string (‘TC string’). The TC string is subsequently shared with advertisers and data brokers, in order to inform them of the user's preferences. At the same time, the CMP writes a cookie called eucon

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Violations (6)

No Reject Button
critical

Cookie banner does not provide a clear reject/refuse all button at the same level as the accept button.

Art. 7 GDPR

Reject Harder Than Accept
critical

Refusing cookies requires more clicks or steps than accepting them, or the reject option is less visually prominent.

Art. 7 GDPR

Third-Party Cookies Without Consent
critical

Third-party tracking cookies or scripts are loaded without obtaining prior user consent.

Art. 13, 14 GDPR

Unclear Cookie Information
high

The cookie banner or cookie policy provides vague, incomplete, or unclear information about what cookies are used and why.

Art. 12, 13 GDPR

Misleading Banner Messaging
critical

The cookie banner uses misleading language to trick or pressure users into accepting cookies (dark patterns).

Art. 7 GDPR

No Granular Cookie Choice
high

Users cannot select or deselect individual cookie categories; consent is presented as all-or-nothing.

Art. 4(11) GDPR

Details

Ruling Date

14 May 2025

Authority

Autorité de Protection des Données

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified
Cookie relevance: 100%

Cite as: Cookie Fines. IAB Europe - Belgium (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: