Court case 10 A 5385/22 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2025)
A German court ruled that a publishing house's consent banner for cookies was misleading and didn't allow users to easily refuse consent. This matters because it shows that companies must make it easy for visitors to opt-out of tracking. If you run a website, you need to ensure your consent mechanisms are clear and user-friendly.
What happened
The court found that the publishing house's cookie consent banner did not allow users to reject cookies easily.
Who was affected
Website visitors who encountered the cookie consent banner on the publishing house's site.
What the authority found
The court decided that the publishing house violated GDPR rules by not obtaining valid consent for tracking technologies.
Why this matters
This ruling emphasizes the importance of clear consent practices for all website operators. Companies should review their cookie banners to ensure they comply with consent requirements.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
National Law Articles
The controller is a publishing house that publishes newspapers and content on the Internet at www.noz.de. The controller uses a consent banner (so-called cookie wall) on its website. The defendant is the DPA of Lower Saxony (LfDI). In 15 November 2022, the DPA carried out a technical test on the controller’s website and found that when it was first accessed, without prior consent, the US service Google Tag Manager was contacted meaning that user data were transmitted to Google’s US server and data were stored on the user's device. Also, a consent banner titled "optimal user experience" appeared with the options to "Accept all", in the middle of the banner, or "Accept & close x", at the top right (the x referring to the symbol used to close a window). In order to refuse consent users had to scroll down, select the "Settings" button and at the window opened on a second level, the user must check whether the opt-in controls are switched off in order to then select the "Save selection" button. On 23 November 2022, the DPA issued a decision ordering the controller; a. To implement the requirements for effective consent in accordance with Article 4(11) and Article 7 GDPR, insofar as this is necessary for the lawfulness of the use of local storage objects, tracking technologies and third-party services; b. To obtain effective consent for the Google Tag Manager service integrated in the website in accordance with Section 25 (1) of the german Telecommunications-Digital Services Data Protection Act (TTDSG) and Art. 6(1) (a) GDPR or to remove the service; and c. To comply with the orders within 1 month. The DPA argued that the consent was not fully informed and voluntary in accordance with Article 4(11) GDPR. At the first level of the banner there was no literal mention that the buttons "Accept all" and "Accept & close x" provide two options for granting consent and also there was no option to refuse consent. On December 2022, the controller filed a case before Adm
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Violations (4)
Cookie banner does not provide a clear reject/refuse all button at the same level as the accept button.
Art. 7 GDPR
Refusing cookies requires more clicks or steps than accepting them, or the reject option is less visually prominent.
Art. 7 GDPR
Non-essential cookies (tracking, advertising) are placed on the user's device before obtaining valid consent.
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Third-party tracking cookies or scripts are loaded without obtaining prior user consent.
Art. 13, 14 GDPR
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case 10 A 5385/22 in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Similar Cases
Enforcement actions with similar violations
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 10 A 5385/22 - Germany (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: