Court case 10 A 5385/22 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2025)

Court Ruling
DPA VGHannover19 March 2025Germany
final
ePrivacy
Court Ruling

A German court ruled that a publishing house's consent banner for cookies was misleading and didn't allow users to easily refuse consent. This matters because it shows that companies must make it easy for visitors to opt-out of tracking. If you run a website, you need to ensure your consent mechanisms are clear and user-friendly.

What happened

The court found that the publishing house's cookie consent banner did not allow users to reject cookies easily.

Who was affected

Website visitors who encountered the cookie consent banner on the publishing house's site.

What the authority found

The court decided that the publishing house violated GDPR rules by not obtaining valid consent for tracking technologies.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes the importance of clear consent practices for all website operators. Companies should review their cookie banners to ensure they comply with consent requirements.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 7(GDPR)
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 4(11) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(d) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 4(11) GDPR
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 7(GDPR)
Art. 58(2)(d) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

National Law Articles

AI-identified

S25 TTDSG
§ 20 para. 1 NDSG
Decision AuthorityVerwaltungsgericht Hannover
Reviewed AuthorityLfDI Lower Saxony
Source verified 12 April 2026
national law identified
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The controller is a publishing house that publishes newspapers and content on the Internet at www.noz.de. The controller uses a consent banner (so-called cookie wall) on its website. The defendant is the DPA of Lower Saxony (LfDI). In 15 November 2022, the DPA carried out a technical test on the controller’s website and found that when it was first accessed, without prior consent, the US service Google Tag Manager was contacted meaning that user data were transmitted to Google’s US server and data were stored on the user's device. Also, a consent banner titled "optimal user experience" appeared with the options to "Accept all", in the middle of the banner, or "Accept & close x", at the top right (the x referring to the symbol used to close a window). In order to refuse consent users had to scroll down, select the "Settings" button and at the window opened on a second level, the user must check whether the opt-in controls are switched off in order to then select the "Save selection" button. On 23 November 2022, the DPA issued a decision ordering the controller; a. To implement the requirements for effective consent in accordance with Article 4(11) and Article 7 GDPR, insofar as this is necessary for the lawfulness of the use of local storage objects, tracking technologies and third-party services; b. To obtain effective consent for the Google Tag Manager service integrated in the website in accordance with Section 25 (1) of the german Telecommunications-Digital Services Data Protection Act (TTDSG) and Art. 6(1) (a) GDPR or to remove the service; and c. To comply with the orders within 1 month. The DPA argued that the consent was not fully informed and voluntary in accordance with Article 4(11) GDPR. At the first level of the banner there was no literal mention that the buttons "Accept all" and "Accept & close x" provide two options for granting consent and also there was no option to refuse consent. On December 2022, the controller filed a case before Adm

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Violations (4)

No Reject Button
critical

Cookie banner does not provide a clear reject/refuse all button at the same level as the accept button.

Art. 7 GDPR

Reject Harder Than Accept
critical

Refusing cookies requires more clicks or steps than accepting them, or the reject option is less visually prominent.

Art. 7 GDPR

Cookies Placed Before Consent
critical

Non-essential cookies (tracking, advertising) are placed on the user's device before obtaining valid consent.

Art. 6(1) GDPR

Third-Party Cookies Without Consent
critical

Third-party tracking cookies or scripts are loaded without obtaining prior user consent.

Art. 13, 14 GDPR

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 10 A 5385/22 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

19 March 2025

Authority

DPA VGHannover

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified
Cookie relevance: 100%

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 10 A 5385/22 - Germany (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: