Meta Platforms Inc. – Court Ruling (Germany, 2025)
A court ruled that Meta Platforms Inc. was solely responsible for obtaining user consent for cookies on a fan page operated by the Federal Press Office. This matters because it clarifies that companies providing tracking tools can be held accountable for how they collect user data. Website operators should ensure they have proper consent mechanisms in place when using such tools.
What happened
Meta Platforms Inc. was found solely responsible for obtaining consent for cookie placement on a fan page.
Who was affected
Visitors to the Federal Press Office's fan page on Facebook were affected.
What the authority found
The court held that Meta was responsible for ensuring that user consent was obtained for cookie placement, not the Federal Press Office.
Why this matters
This ruling sets a precedent that service providers like Meta can be held accountable for compliance with data protection laws, urging website operators to review their consent practices.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 9 April 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The Federal Press Office operated a fan page on the social network Facebook, provided by Meta Platforms Inc., where it provided information about current political activities of the Federal Government. When users visited the page, cookies could be placed on their end devices. In 2023, the Federal DPA (BfDI) prohibited the Federal Press Office from operating its fan page because the design of the cookie banner used by Meta was not GDPR compliant. It held that the Federal Press Office was regarded a joint controller, together with Meta, responsible for ensuring that the data processing regarding cookies was based on a sufficient legal basis such as consent. Therefore, not only Meta, but also the Federal Press Office, as the operator of the fan page, was legally obliged to obtain the consent of the respective visitor. Both the Federal Government and Meta appealed against the DPA's decision addressed to the Federal Press Office before the court of first instance (Cologne Administrative Court-VG Cologne). The court held that under the GDPR, Meta and the Federal Press Office were not joint controllers for the contested data processing. Meta was solely responsible for obtaining the consent of visitors of the fan page for the placement of cookies. It ruled that the Federal Press Office's contribution to the storage and reading of cookies was limited to the operation of the page. In particular, the Federal Press Office could not specify any parameters for the placement of the cookies and the analysis of the data collected. In the opinion of the court, the mere facilitation of data processing does not constitute the necessary joint determination of the means of data processing. Consequently, the Press and Information Office of the Federal Government was permitted to continue operating its Facebook fan page.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Violations (3)
Cookie banner does not provide a clear reject/refuse all button at the same level as the accept button.
Art. 7 GDPR
Refusing cookies requires more clicks or steps than accepting them, or the reject option is less visually prominent.
Art. 7 GDPR
Third-party tracking cookies or scripts are loaded without obtaining prior user consent.
Art. 13, 14 GDPR
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Meta Platforms Inc. in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Similar Cases
Enforcement actions with similar violations
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Meta Platforms Inc. - Germany (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: