Der Standard – Court Ruling (Austria, 2025)
An Austrian court ruled against Der Standard for using a 'Pay or Okay' model that forced users to consent to cookie tracking or pay for a subscription. This decision is important because it reinforces that users must have clear choices about their data.
What happened
Der Standard's website required users to accept cookies for tracking or pay a subscription fee to avoid ads.
Who was affected
Website visitors who were forced to choose between consenting to data tracking or paying for access were affected.
What the authority found
The court ruled that the 'Pay or Okay' model violated GDPR by not allowing users to choose which data processing activities to consent to.
Why this matters
This ruling sets a precedent that companies must provide clear and separate consent options for data processing. Website operators should review their consent practices to comply with GDPR.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
Der Standard (the controller) is an Austrian daily newspaper. The website implemented a pop-up window, which gave the data subject the option of consenting to the use of cookies for web analysis and advertising, or to pay a monthly subscription and access the website without advertising (also known as “Pay or Okay”). A data subject chose the option of accepting cookies, as they did not want to take out a paid subscription, but also regularly deleted their cookie history because they did not want to be tracked. The data subject brought a complaint to the DPA on 13 August 2021, arguing that they had been forced to consent to extensive processing of their data or take a paid subscription. The data subject was represented by noyb. Furthermore, the blanket consent to all data processing does not comply with the GDPR. The controller argued that data processing for advertising purposes was necessary for the provision of its services. In addition, the “Pay or Okay” model was permissible, according to a previous decision of the DPA. Finally, the uniform consent to several data processing operations was permissible under the GDPR. In its decision on 29 March 2023, the DPA stated that the “Pay or Okay” model followed by the controller violated Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 6(1)(a) GDPR, as it lacked granularity. This meant that the data subject could not choose which processing activities to consent to, and was forced to consent to all processing activities (or pay a subscription fee). In addition, the DPA ordered the controller to delete the data subject’s personal data if it was still processed within a month of the decision. However, the DPA dismissed the data subject’s request to issue a processing ban. The controller appealed the decision to the Federal Administrative Court, contesting the decision that there was a violation and the order to delete the data. The data subject also appealed the decision, contesting the decision to dismiss the request to issue a proce
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Violations (3)
Non-essential cookies (tracking, advertising) are placed on the user's device before obtaining valid consent.
Art. 6(1) GDPR
The cookie banner uses misleading language to trick or pressure users into accepting cookies (dark patterns).
Art. 7 GDPR
Users cannot select or deselect individual cookie categories; consent is presented as all-or-nothing.
Art. 4(11) GDPR
Related Cases (1)
Other cases involving Der Standard in AT
Similar Cases
Enforcement actions with similar violations
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Der Standard - Austria (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: