ANSPDCP – Court Ruling (Romania, 2026)
A Romanian court upheld a decision against a politician for not properly informing visitors about cookie usage on his website. The court found that users couldn't easily give consent for cookies, which is important for protecting their privacy. This ruling emphasizes the need for clear cookie consent mechanisms on websites.
What happened
The court dismissed an appeal from a politician who was sanctioned for placing optional cookies on users' devices without proper consent.
Who was affected
Website visitors who accessed the politician's site and had their data processed through cookies.
What the authority found
The court ruled that the politician did not provide a clear way for users to consent to cookies, violating GDPR requirements for transparency.
Why this matters
This case highlights the importance of clear consent for cookies, reminding website operators to ensure users can easily accept or reject cookie usage.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 9 April 2026.
Processing notes: national law identified, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
A politician, the operator of a website (the controller), appealed a DPA decision sanctioning him for the placement of optional cookies onto users’ devices when visiting his website, as well as for failing to inform data subjects of the processing of their personal data via the contact form available on the website. The DPA sanctioned the controller a total of RON 50,286.80 (approximately €10,000) for breaching Article 4(5)(a) & (b) Romanian Law no. 506/2004 transposing e-Privacy Directive 2002/58 and Article 12 GDPR, Article 13 GDPR and Article 14 GDPR. The controller claimed in its appeal that, among other things, the DPA failed to include in its decision the complete mandatory information prescribed by administrative law, that the cookies placed on the users’ devices were necessary, and that data subjects were informed of the processing activities on the website. Therefore, the controller requested the annulment of the DPA decision. The court dismissed the controller’s appeal. It found that the website links directing to the privacy policy and information notice were not functional, but that they became functional following communications from the DPA to the controller. Furthermore, the court noted that website users did not have a clear and visible way of providing consent to the use of cookies on the website. Moreover, the court found that the DPA decision contained most of the necessary information required by law. The court noted that the missing information referred only to the objections of the controller. However, the court emphasised that such an omission did not require the annulment of the DPA decision, since the controller was able to raise his objections during the appeal. Finally, the court emphasised the electoral context in which the violations occurred, pointing out that the increased danger for the unlawful processing of the personal data collected via the website at that time. Therefore, the court dismissed the controller’s appeal an
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Violations (4)
Cookie banner does not provide a clear reject/refuse all button at the same level as the accept button.
Art. 7 GDPR
Non-essential cookies (tracking, advertising) are placed on the user's device before obtaining valid consent.
Art. 6(1) GDPR
The cookie banner or cookie policy provides vague, incomplete, or unclear information about what cookies are used and why.
Art. 12, 13 GDPR
Users cannot select or deselect individual cookie categories; consent is presented as all-or-nothing.
Art. 4(11) GDPR
Related Cases (1)
Other cases involving ANSPDCP in RO
Similar Cases
Enforcement actions with similar violations
Details
Ruling Date
12 January 2026
Authority
Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-court-9826About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. ANSPDCP - Romania (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: