X.AI LLC – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2026)

Court Ruling
DPA RbAmsterdam26 March 2026Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Dutch court ruled that X.AI LLC must stop generating and distributing sexualized images through its AI chatbot Grok. This decision is important because it addresses the issue of harmful content generated by AI and sets a standard for how companies should manage such technologies.

What happened

A court prohibited X.AI LLC from generating and distributing sexual imagery through its AI chatbot Grok.

Who was affected

Users of the Grok chatbot and individuals depicted in the generated images, including minors, were affected.

What the authority found

The court ruled that X.AI LLC's actions posed risks of distributing illegal content, including non-consensual imagery and child pornography, violating obligations under the Digital Services Act.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes the need for companies using AI to have strict controls over content generation. It sets a precedent for accountability in the tech industry regarding harmful content.

National Law Articles

AI-identified

Article 6:162(2) BW
Decision AuthorityRb. Amsterdam
Source verified 9 April 2026
articles corrected
national law identified
entity split needed
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

X is a social media platform. X.AI LLC (a US company) is the provider of the generative AI chatbot Grok. X Internet Unlimited Company (XIUC) is the Irish entity that operates the platform in the European Economic Area and the UK (outside of these regions it is provided by X Corp, a US corporation). For GDPR purposes, XIUC is the controller in this case. One of the tasks that Grok does is generating visual content, where users can request the LLM to generate and/or edit images. Stichting Offlimits (a non profit organisation) estimated that Grok had generated approximately 3 million sexualised images between December 29 2025 and January 9 2026, of which approximately 23,000 depicted children. The controller later restricted the feature to paid members, and announced measures to prevent the Grok account on X from editing images of real people. In January 2026 the EU Commission announced that it was launching an investigation on whether the controller met its obligations under the Digital Services Act (DSA) relating to the dissemination of illegal content in the EU. In February 2026 Stichting Offlimits filed preliminary injunction before the court, requesting that the court prohibit the controller from generating and/or distributing sexual imagery through the image generating functionality. This was the case for non consensual imagery and imagery classified as child pornography under national law. In addition, the organisation requested the court to prohibit the controller from offering Grok’s functionality as part of its platform as long as it allows users to generate these images. The organisation brought claims based on tort and violations of the GDPR; specifically it argued that creating and distributing non consensual nude images was unlawful processing of personal data under the GDPR. The controller argued that it was impossible to generate these images, and that it implemented technical safeguards to prevent users from circumventing the restrictions on generati

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for X.AI LLC in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

26 March 2026

Authority

DPA RbAmsterdam

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. X.AI LLC - Netherlands (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: