CJEU case C‑371/24 Comdribus – CJEU Judgment (France, 2026)

CJEU Judgment
Court of Justice of the European Union19 March 2026France
final
CJEU Judgment

CJEU judgment — not a DPA enforcement action

This is a Court of Justice ruling, not an enforcement action by a data protection authority. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Court of Justice ruled on a case involving a protester who refused to provide biometric data to police. This ruling is significant because it addresses the balance between law enforcement needs and individual privacy rights.

What happened

A protester was found guilty for not providing biometric data like fingerprints during an arrest.

Who was affected

A climate protester who was detained by law enforcement officers.

What the authority found

The Court held that national law must align with the Law Enforcement Directive regarding the processing of biometric data.

Why this matters

This ruling sets a precedent for how law enforcement can handle biometric data, emphasizing the need to respect individual rights while pursuing investigations.

National Law Articles

AI-identified

Art. 55-1 Code of Criminal Procedure
Decision AuthorityCJEU
Reviewed AuthorityParis Court of Appeal
Source verified 17 April 2026
articles corrected
national law identified
authority corrected
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

In 2020, law enforcement officers arrested several people from a climate protest. One of the individuals detained (the data subject) provided their identity, but refused to be fingerprinted and photographed, as well as to provide the code to their phone (or unlock it themselves). The data subject was later accused before the Paris Criminal Court of unlawfully organising a protest, as well as refusing to provide their data for identification and investigation purposes in accordance with national lawArticle 55-1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court found them guilty of not providing their biometric data and fined the data subject €300. Both the data subject and Public Prosecutor appealed the decision to the Paris Court of Appeal. The court requested a preliminary ruling from the CJEU, regarding the compatibility of national law with provisions of the Law Enforcement Directive (LED), taking into consideration previous case lawSee Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti (Recording of biometric and genetic data by the police) (C‑205/21, EU:C:2023:49, paragraph 135). Specifically, the court had questions regarding the systematic processing of biometric data of a data subject reasonably suspected of having committed or attempted to commit an offense in the context of an investigation, when the data subject has not necessarily been accused of committing an offense. The court referred the following questions: 1. Does the LED preclude national legislation from systematically processing identification data from data subjects who are suspected of having committed or attempted to commit an offense? 2. Does the LED require national legislation to oblige a competent authority to sufficiently explain why it is strictly necessary to process this data on an individual basis? 3. Does the LED preclude national legislation from allowing data subjects to be prosecuted on the basis of refusing to provide identification data, even if they are not prosecuted for or convicted of the offen

Outcome

CJEU Judgment

A judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union, typically on a preliminary reference from a national court.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for CJEU case C‑371/24 Comdribus in FR

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Judgment Date

19 March 2026

Authority

Court of Justice of the European Union

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. CJEU case C‑371/24 Comdribus - France (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: