Myndoor S.r.l. – Violation Found (Italy, 2026)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
Myndoor S.r.l. was investigated for using AI to analyze employee messages without proper consent. This is important because it raises concerns about privacy in the workplace. Companies should be cautious about how they monitor employee communications and ensure they have valid legal bases for such practices.
What happened
Myndoor S.r.l. was investigated for using a system that analyzed employee messages for sentiment without proper consent.
Who was affected
Employees whose messages were analyzed by Myndoor S.r.l. were affected.
What the authority found
The Garante per la protezione dei dati personali found that Myndoor S.r.l. lacked a valid legal basis for processing personal data under GDPR.
Why this matters
This investigation highlights the need for transparency and consent in workplace monitoring. Businesses should evaluate their monitoring practices to comply with data protection laws.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 3 June 2026.
Processing notes: national law identified, scope corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
Myndoor S.r.l. (the controller) is a workplace consulting company. The controller offers a plug-in system that carries out sentiment analysis of messages exchanged by employees (data subjects) that activated the plug-in. The system used AI to analyse the content of messages sent between data subjects in order to assess their stress levels, and generated a report on a weekly basis. The DPA initiated an ex-officio investigation following press reports on the controller. During its investigations, the controller stated that it currently only provided the service to one company, and that the report was only compiled if a minimum number of data subjects used it. In addition, the controller argued that the report covered the entire workforce of a company to prevent employees from being identified. Finally, the controller argued that the system only processed information provided by the data subject (such as names and contact information), and that sensitive and usage data was anonymised. The DPA first clarified that the company providing the system acted as a controller in relation to the data subjects, and not the employers who purchased the system. According to the DPA, employers are technically prohibited from accessing the data processed by the controller to provide the service, and would in any case lack the valid legal basis to do so under the GDPR. While employers can receive reports of the data subjects’ stress levels, the DPA concluded that the employer in question did not have sufficient information to identify the data subjects involved.The DPA compared this to employers entering into a contract for the provision of benefits and services to employees (such as health insurance or access to psychological counselling services). The DPA also emphasised that the controller has the obligation to comply with the GDPR from the design phase (Article 25 GDPR). In addition, the controller must comply with national provisions that prohibit employers from collecting dat
Outcome
Violation Found
The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for Myndoor S.r.l. in IT
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Decision Date
14 May 2026
Authority
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-10036About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Myndoor S.r.l. - Italy (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: