Court case Us I-451/2025-10 – Court Ruling (Croatia, 2026)

Court Ruling
Agencija za zaštitu osobnih podataka21 May 2026Croatia
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Croatian media outlet published personal information about a public figure, and the court ruled that this was acceptable due to public interest. This is significant because it highlights the balance between privacy and freedom of expression.

What happened

The media outlet published articles disclosing personal information about a public figure, including their salary and vehicle details.

Who was affected

The public figure whose personal information was published in the media articles.

What the authority found

The court determined that the publication was justified by the public interest and did not violate data protection rules.

Why this matters

This ruling underscores the importance of public interest in media reporting, reminding companies to consider the balance between privacy and the right to inform the public.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 17(1) GDPR
Art. 17(3)(a) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 17(1) GDPR
Art. 17(3)(a) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

National Law Articles

AI-identified

Art. 8 Croatian Media Act
Decision AuthorityAdministrative Court of Zagreb
Reviewed AuthorityAZOP
Source verified 13 June 2026
national law identified
authority corrected
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

In 2022, a Croatian media outlet published articles about a person (claimant) who was, at the time, a member of the management board of Zagrebački holding d.o.o, a City of Zagreb-owned holding company providing municipal and utility services. The articles disclosed their name, the company where they were employed, their position, gross salary, the model of their personal vehicle, the gross monthly allowance for using a private vehicle, and the amount of a fine imposed by the Croatian Commission for the Resolution of Conflicts of Interest. The claimant held the management board position from September 2021 to March 2023. The claimant lodged a complaint with the Croatian DPA, alleging that the publication infringed their right to the protection of personal data and requesting the removal of the articles. The DPA rejected the complaint and found no violation. It concluded that the published personal data were appropriate, relevant and necessary for informing the public, due to the claimant’s position at the time of publication and because the public interest prevailed. The DPA also found that the public interest in the continued availability of the articles outweighed the data subject’s request for erasure under Article 17 GDPR. It pointed out that Article 17(3)(a) GDPR stipulates that the right to erasure does not apply to the extent that the processing is necessary for the exercise of the right to freedom of expression and information. The DPA considered the Croatian Media Act, noting that it applied as a special law. The Act regulates conditions for media freedom, the rights of journalists and access to public information. The DPA determined that according to Article 8 of the Media Act, there was no violation of the right to privacy if a legitimate public interest prevailed over the protection of privacy in relation to journalistic activities. The claimant contested the DPA’s decision before the Administrative Court of Zagreb. They argued that they were not a publ

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case Us I-451/2025-10 in HR

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

21 May 2026

Authority

Agencija za zaštitu osobnih podataka

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case Us I-451/2025-10 - Croatia (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: