Court case W254 2253351-1 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2025)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A court in Austria ruled on a case about a person's access to their personal data held by a credit agency. This is significant because it reinforces the right of individuals to know what data companies hold about them.
What happened
The court addressed a complaint regarding incomplete access to personal data from a credit information agency.
Who was affected
The individual who requested access to their personal data was affected.
What the authority found
The court found that the credit agency did not fully disclose all relevant personal data as required by GDPR.
Why this matters
This ruling emphasizes the importance of transparency in data handling. Companies must ensure they provide complete information when individuals request access to their data.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
The data subject requested access under Article 15 GDPR from the controller (a credit information agency). The controller provided the personal data it held, including the data subject's name, date of birth, address and business role, as well as information about the sources of those data. The data subject considered the response incomplete and requested further information. The controller provided additional information, including the companies that had queried the data subject's creditworthiness between 2014 and 2021 and the credit scores disclosed to them. The data subject then lodged a complaint with the DPA. The data subject argued that the controller processed more personal data than it had disclosed, pointing in particular to the broader categories listed in the controller’s privacy notice and the absence of information about certain data sources. During the DPA proceedings, the controller provided another response, saying that the credit score could change based on statistical criteria linked to economic developments, which it considered non-personal. The data subject appealed the DPA's decision. During the court proceedings, the controller provided further information. It explained that the credit score was calculated using, among other things, payment history data, name, age, sex, address, and the first and last confirmation of the address. However, the controller still did not disclose the specific data covered by the statistical parameters linked to general economic developments that it had used when calculating the data subject’s credit score. First, the court rejected the argument that the controller must have processed additional personal data merely because its privacy notice listed broader categories of data. The privacy notice described data that the controller could theoretically process, but this did not establish that the controller actually processed those data in relation to the data subject. Second, the court examined whether the statistic
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case W254 2253351-1 in AT
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W254 2253351-1 - Austria (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: