Court case W254 2253351-1 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2025)

Court Ruling
DPA BVwG14 November 2025Austria
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court in Austria ruled on a case about a person's access to their personal data held by a credit agency. This is significant because it reinforces the right of individuals to know what data companies hold about them.

What happened

The court addressed a complaint regarding incomplete access to personal data from a credit information agency.

Who was affected

The individual who requested access to their personal data was affected.

What the authority found

The court found that the credit agency did not fully disclose all relevant personal data as required by GDPR.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes the importance of transparency in data handling. Companies must ensure they provide complete information when individuals request access to their data.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 15(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 15(GDPR)
Art. 4(1) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Decision AuthorityBVWG
Reviewed AuthorityDPA
Source verified 8 September 2026
verified correct
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject requested access under Article 15 GDPR from the controller (a credit information agency). The controller provided the personal data it held, including the data subject's name, date of birth, address and business role, as well as information about the sources of those data. The data subject considered the response incomplete and requested further information. The controller provided additional information, including the companies that had queried the data subject's creditworthiness between 2014 and 2021 and the credit scores disclosed to them. The data subject then lodged a complaint with the DPA. The data subject argued that the controller processed more personal data than it had disclosed, pointing in particular to the broader categories listed in the controller’s privacy notice and the absence of information about certain data sources. During the DPA proceedings, the controller provided another response, saying that the credit score could change based on statistical criteria linked to economic developments, which it considered non-personal. The data subject appealed the DPA's decision. During the court proceedings, the controller provided further information. It explained that the credit score was calculated using, among other things, payment history data, name, age, sex, address, and the first and last confirmation of the address. However, the controller still did not disclose the specific data covered by the statistical parameters linked to general economic developments that it had used when calculating the data subject’s credit score. First, the court rejected the argument that the controller must have processed additional personal data merely because its privacy notice listed broader categories of data. The privacy notice described data that the controller could theoretically process, but this did not establish that the controller actually processed those data in relation to the data subject. Second, the court examined whether the statistic

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case W254 2253351-1 in AT

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

14 November 2025

Authority

DPA BVwG

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W254 2253351-1 - Austria (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: