Latvijas Republikas Saeima – CJEU Judgment (European Union, 2026)

CJEU Judgment
Court of Justice of the European Union3 September 2026European Union
final
CJEU Judgment

CJEU judgment — not a DPA enforcement action

This is a Court of Justice ruling, not an enforcement action by a data protection authority. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on a case involving shareholders' personal information being publicly accessible. This ruling matters because it addresses privacy concerns related to transparency laws. Companies should be aware of how public access to personal data can impact privacy rights.

What happened

Seventeen shareholders challenged the public disclosure of their personal information in a company register.

Who was affected

The minority shareholders of a public limited liability company were affected by the legislation requiring public access to their data.

What the authority found

The Court held that the national legislation allowing unrestricted access to personal data must balance transparency with privacy rights under GDPR.

Why this matters

This ruling underscores the need for careful consideration of privacy when implementing transparency laws. Businesses should review how they handle and disclose personal data.

GDPR Articles Cited
Automatically processed
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(3) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(3) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Article 7 CFR
Article 8 CFR
Article 14(d) Directive 2017/1132
Decision AuthorityCJEU
Reviewed AuthorityLatvijas Republikas Saeima

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 9 September 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

Seventeen natural persons, who were minority shareholders of a public limited liability company, brought proceedings before the Satversmes tiesa (the Constitutional Court of Latvia). They challenged national legislation requiring information on shareholders to be included in the public companies register. The information made publicly available included shareholders’ identity and contact details, as well as information concerning the class, number and nominal value of their shares and the number of votes attached to them. The information could be accessed online and downloaded in bulk by any person without identification or the need to demonstrate a legitimate interest. The data subjects argued that such disclosure constituted an unjustified and disproportionate interference with their rights, particularly because they were neither beneficial owners nor members of the company’s management bodies and did not exercise control over the company. The national legislation pursued several objectives, including ensuring transparency and protecting third parties, combating money laundering and terrorist financing, and facilitating the implementation of sanctions. The Constitutional Court stated the proceedings and referred questions to the CJEU. In particular, whether [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2017/1132/oj/eng Directive 2017/1132] required such disclosure and whether Articles 5 and 6 GDPR permitted national legislation providing unrestricted public access to that personal data. Directive 2017/1132 The Court first held that [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2017/1132/oj/eng Article 14(d) Directive 2017/1132] does not require the disclosure of information relating to all shareholders, including minority shareholders. Shareholders do not, merely by holding shares, participate in the administration, supervision or control of a company within the meaning of that provision. In particular, minority shareholders are generally not authorised to represent or bind the compa

Outcome

CJEU Judgment

A judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union, typically on a preliminary reference from a national court.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Latvijas Republikas Saeima in EU

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Judgment Date

3 September 2026

Authority

Court of Justice of the European Union

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Latvijas Republikas Saeima - European Union (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: