CJEU case C-12/25 – CJEU Judgment (European Union, 2026)

CJEU Judgment
Court of Justice of the European Union1 October 2026European Union
final
CJEU Judgment

CJEU judgment — not a DPA enforcement action

This is a Court of Justice ruling, not an enforcement action by a data protection authority. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Court of Justice ruled that a person who was baptized as a minor has the right to request the deletion of their personal data from the baptismal register. This matters because it clarifies that individuals can dissociate from religious organizations and have their data erased. It sets a precedent for how personal data should be handled when someone leaves a religious community.

What happened

A person requested the deletion of their personal data from the baptismal register after leaving the Church.

Who was affected

Individuals who were baptized as minors and later wish to dissociate from their religious community are affected.

What the authority found

The Court held that individuals have the right to request the erasure of their personal data from the baptismal register under GDPR.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes the rights of individuals to control their personal data, especially in religious contexts. It signals to organizations that they must take requests for data deletion seriously.

GDPR Articles Cited
Automatically processed
Art. 4(6) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 9(1) GDPR
Art. 9(2)(d) GDPR
Art. 17(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 17(1)(d) GDPR
Art. 17(3)(d) GDPR
Art. 21(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 17(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 17(1)(d) GDPR
Art. 4(6) GDPR
Art. 9(1) GDPR
Art. 9(2)(d) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 21(1) GDPR
Art. 17(3)(d) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityCJEU

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 7 October 2026.

No issues were reported by that automated check.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject was baptised as a minor. The name, date and place of birth and place of baptism were recorded in the baptismal register with the Bisdom Gent (Diocese of Ghent, controller). The baptismal register is a physical book that indicates the date of birth and the place of baptism. It is kept in a safeguarded storage (for example in a locked safe or dedicated room) that only a limited amount of persons affiliated with the Diocese have access to. After the data subject departed from the Church, they requested the controller to erase their personal data from the register. The controller recorded the departure of the data subject from the church with an annotation in the baptismal register. Upon the request, the controller stroke through the personal data of the data subject from the registry, however, it remained legible. The data subject complained with the DPA. The DPA found an infringement of the GDPR. The controller appealed the decision with the Court of Appeal of Brussels. The Court of Appeal, having doubts about the interpretation of the GDPR, referred the question to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling whether an individual who was baptised as a minor and who, as an adult, wishes to dissociate themselves from the religious community in question, has the right to have their personal data erased from the baptismal register. The referring court also wishes to know whether the mere annotation, in the margin of the baptismal register, that a person has left the religious community constitutes ‘erasure’ within the meaning of Article 17(1) and (3) of the GDPR. The Advocate General structured the opinion under the aspects of applicability of the GDPR, right to erasure, archiving in the public interest or historical research, and the concept of "erasure". = Firstly, according to the Advocate General Medina, the baptismal register is to be considered a filing system under Article 4(6) GDPR. Therefore, the GDPR is applicable despite the manual processing of the

Outcome

CJEU Judgment

A judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union, typically on a preliminary reference from a national court.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for CJEU case C-12/25 in EU

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Judgment Date

1 October 2026

Authority

Court of Justice of the European Union

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. CJEU case C-12/25 - European Union (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: