DPA case 07121-1/2020/428 – Violation Found (Slovenia, 2020)

Violation Found
Informacijski pooblaščenec29 March 2020Slovenia
final
Violation Found

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Slovenia's Information Commissioner addressed a complaint about police accessing video footage from a car accident without consent. This ruling is significant because it clarifies who can access such footage and under what conditions.

What happened

The police accessed video footage of a car accident without needing consent from the individuals involved.

Who was affected

Individuals involved in the car accident and the insurance company handling the claim.

What the authority found

The Information Commissioner confirmed that the police can access footage for their investigations without consent, while insurance companies need a legal basis to access it.

Why this matters

This case sets a precedent for how personal data in video footage can be accessed. It reminds businesses to understand the legal grounds for sharing or accessing such data.

GDPR Articles Cited
Automatically processed
Art. 6(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(GDPR)
Art. 58(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Art. 113 ZNPPol

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

An individual notified the IP about a car accident in a parking lot, where he was involved. The police inspected video footage which was recording the parking lot. He claimed that the police should have asked the participants' consent and he asked the IP whether the insurance company dealing with the claim may inspect the footage upon his request. The IP distinguished among the three following possibilities: - the data subject concerned has the right to access the footage regardless of the consent of other participants in the footage; - a third party such as the insurance company may have lawful access to the footage only if it has an adequate legal basis under Article 6(1) GDPR; - when performing police tasks, the police may access the recordings without the consent of the participants pursuant to Article 113 ZNPPol.

Outcome

Violation Found

The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 07121-1/2020/428 in SI

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

29 March 2020

Authority

Informacijski pooblaščenec

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-2265

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 07121-1/2020/428 - Slovenia (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: