- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Slovenia · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
DPA case 7121-1 / 2020/369 – Order (Slovenia, 2020)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An authority clarified that students can give consent electronically for online classroom activities. This is important because it allows schools to adapt to current challenges while still respecting privacy laws. It shows that consent can be obtained in various ways, not just in writing.
What happened
Schools asked whether students could provide consent electronically instead of in writing during the pandemic.
Who was affected
Students whose consent is needed for online classroom activities.
What the authority found
The authority confirmed that electronic consent is valid under GDPR as long as it meets certain conditions.
Why this matters
This guidance is crucial for educational institutions adapting to digital learning. It highlights flexibility in obtaining consent while ensuring compliance with privacy regulations.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Archived or cached source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
Various providers have opened up their digital content to provide free access to this content for students and students, and some are looking to gain access to creating classrooms by groups of students' online addresses. The IP received a request from the principals whether the consent would be valid if the students gave it electronically via e-mail, and not in the written form, since a handwritten consent cannot be obtained during the pandemic period. The IP clarified that under the GDPR consent does not have to be handwritten. According to Article 4(11) GDPR, "consent of the data subject means any freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous indication of the data subject’s wishes by which he or she, by a statement or by a clear affirmative action, signifies agreement to the processing of personal data relating to him or her". Consent may therefore be given in writing, electronically or in another appropriate manner. The IP further provided that the validity of consent must be subject to the conditions laid down in Article 7 GDPR. Additionally, in this case, the IP also reiterated the provisions of Article 8 GDPR on conditions applicable to child's consent in relation to information society services. Against this background, consent may also be given by electronic means subject to the conditions set out in Articles 7 and 8 GDPR. It is also recalled that individuals need to be properly informed before giving their consent - they should be clearly informed of what personal data will be processed, for what purposes, about their rights, etc., as required by Article 13 GDPR.
Outcome
Order
A binding order requiring the controller to take specific action.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 7121-1 / 2020/369 in SI
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 7121-1 / 2020/369 - Slovenia (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: