- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Italy · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- No confirmed legal basis recorded.
- Privacy topics
DPA case 9347280 – Violation Found (Italy, 2020)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
Italy's data protection authority approved a draft decree for online administrative hearings but raised concerns about using private platforms for such purposes. The authority recommended using national IT infrastructure to protect personal data better. This case highlights the need for careful consideration of data privacy when using online tools.
What happened
The authority reviewed and approved a draft decree for conducting online administrative hearings.
Who was affected
Participants in administrative proceedings that would be held online.
What the authority found
The authority supported the draft decree but advised against using private platforms due to potential data privacy issues.
Why this matters
This case emphasizes the importance of protecting personal data in online settings. Organizations should consider secure, compliant platforms for conducting online activities.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The Council of State requested, pursuant to art. 4 of Decree-Law no. 28/2020, the opinion of the DPA on a draft presidential decree containing the technical-operational rules to manage oral discussion in the context of administrative proceedings through an online system (i.e. Microsoft Teams) from May 30 to July 31, 2020. However, the DPA is concerned about using a private platform that can be subject to the US CLOUD Act requirements. Notwithstanding that the Council of State clarified that in the absence of the recording of the hearings and the exchange of messages on internal chat (which are not included in the decree scheme), the videoconferencing provider would not acquire any personal data outside the "metadata" of the videoconference. Furthermore, Annex 1 of the draft decree covers how to access to the electronic file and consultation of data identifying outstanding cases. The Italian DPA gave a favourable opinion on the measures provided by the draft decree. Notwithstanding that the Council of State clarified that the third-party provider would not acquire any personal data outside the videoconference metadata if the hearing and the messages on internal chat (which are not allowed in the draft decree) are not recorded, the DPA has strongly recommended to use an IT infrastructure that is managed by the public administration at a national level, once the emergency is over.
Outcome
Violation Found
The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 9347280 in IT
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 9347280 - Italy (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: