- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Slovenia · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
DPA case 07121-1/2020/693 – Order (Slovenia, 2020)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An individual asked if an insurance company could require a five-year-old medical record for a car accident claim. The authority found that while the insurer can ask for necessary documents, it must still follow data protection rules and explain why the information is needed.
What happened
An insurance company requested a five-year-old medical record from an individual to process a claim.
Who was affected
The individual who filed a claim for compensation after a car accident.
What the authority found
The authority stated that the insurer is allowed to request necessary documentation for the claim but must adhere to data protection obligations.
Why this matters
This case highlights the importance of transparency in data requests. Companies must clearly explain why they need personal information to comply with data protection laws.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The IP was informed that an individual had filed a claim for compensation for damage caused by a car accident. The insurer now requires the injured party to have a photocopy of the medical record five years ago. You are wondering if the request is justified and in line with existing personal data protection legislation, especially since the insurance company does not explain why it requires that information. It merely states that they will not resolve the case until the required information has been received. According to Article 268(6),(8) and (11) ZZavar-1. The insurer is entitled to obtain relevant medical records (including the entire medical records card) relating to the insured or beneficiary of the insurance, if such documentation is necessary for different insurance purposes. The IP found that the insurance company is entitled to ask for the documentation necessary to decide on the insurance claim. However, the IP, when issuing an opinion, cannot address the question of whether it is necessary and proportionate for an insurer to request information for five years back. The IP also found that the the insurance company is bound by the information obligation of Article 13 GDPR.
Outcome
Order
A binding order requiring the controller to take specific action.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 07121-1/2020/693 in SI
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 07121-1/2020/693 - Slovenia (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: