Enforcing jurisdiction
Belgium · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

DPA case 130/2021 – Complaint Upheld (Belgium, 2021)

Complaint Upheld
Autorité de Protection des Données29 November 2021Belgium
final
Complaint Upheld

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Belgium's data protection authority upheld a complaint after a person's identity was revealed to suspects in an illegal dumping case. The authority found that the agency did not need to disclose the complainant's identity to investigate the issue. This ruling reinforces the importance of protecting individuals' identities in sensitive situations.

What happened

A person's identity was disclosed to suspects in a municipal fine procedure without her consent.

Who was affected

The complainant whose identity was revealed to the suspects.

What the authority found

The authority decided that the agency unlawfully disclosed the complainant's personal data without her consent.

Why this matters

This case underscores the need for authorities to protect individuals' identities and not disclose personal data unnecessarily, which is crucial for public trust.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 5(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

No issues were reported by that automated check.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On 19 August 2021, a data subject (the Complainant) reported illegal dumping to the competent municipal services. An official report identifying four suspects was drafted by the competent police force. This official report, including its non-anonymised annexes, was then submitted to the competent authority (the Authority) in the framework of a municipal administrative sanction procedure (Gemeentelijke Administratieve Sanctie or 'GAS' procedure). The fine, including its non-anonymised annexes, was then passed on from the Authority to the four suspects. As a result, the four suspects were informed about the identity of the Complainant. On 16 September 2021, the Complainant was approached by one of the four suspects; the latter confronted her about her initial complaint on the illegal dumping. Because of this, the Complainant realised that her identity had been revealed by the Authority to the four suspects in the context of the GAS procedure. On 20 September 2021, the Complainant therefore filed a complaint with the Belgian DPA against the Authority, on the ground that the latter had unlawfully disclosed her personal data to the four suspects without her consent within the framework of the GAS procedure. The Belgian DPA found that the Authority had obtained the personal data of the Complainant for a specific purpose, namely to investigate and impose a fine for illegal dumping in the context of the GAS procedure. The Belgian DPA stressed that the Authority did not need to reveal the identity of the Complainant to the four suspects to be able to investigate the illegal dumping and impose a fine. In other words, the four suspects were not part of the category of recipients to whom the personal data should have been disclosed for the purpose of the processing to be achieved. As a consequence, the Belgian DPA found that there had been a breach of the principle of purpose limitation pursuant to Article 5(1)(b) GDPR, since the disclosure of the Complainant's personal dat

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 130/2021 in BE

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

29 November 2021

Authority

Autorité de Protection des Données

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-4423

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 130/2021 - Belgium (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: