Enforcing jurisdiction
Iceland · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

DPA case 2020010642 – Complaint Upheld (Iceland, 2021)

Complaint Upheld
Persónuvernd30 September 2021Iceland
final
Complaint Upheld

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A complaint was upheld by the Icelandic data protection authority after a school employee's report about inappropriate behavior was shared without her knowledge. This matters because it highlights the need for organizations to inform individuals when their personal data is shared. It reminds public bodies to respect privacy during investigations.

What happened

The Child Protection Committee shared a report about a school employee without informing her beforehand.

Who was affected

The school employee who reported inappropriate behavior and had her name shared without consent.

What the authority found

The authority ruled that sharing the employee's name without her knowledge did not comply with data protection law.

Why this matters

This case reinforces the importance of transparency in data sharing, especially in sensitive situations, and reminds organizations to respect individuals' privacy rights.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 5(1) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(e) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(e) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Art. 9(5) Icelandic Data Protection Act no. 90/2018
Articles 16, 17 or 18 Icelandic Child Welfare Act no. 80/2002

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The employee of a primary school (the Complainant) called the Icelandic Child Protection Committee (CPC) to orally report the inappropriate behaviors of one of her colleagues towards children under their care. During the phone call, the employee of the CPC wrote down the name of the Complainant, but not the identity of the children concerned. Because this report did not include the name of any children, the CPC considered that it was not competent to investigate the case. Without informing the Complainant about it, the CPC then transmitted the report to the education and leisure department of the competent municipality (the Municipality). The Municipality then started an investigation and interviewed both the Complainant and her colleague. The Complainant had not been informed beforehand that she would be included in this procedure. The Complainant considered that the disclosure of her name by the CPC to the Municipality without informing her beforehand, and the further processing of her personal data by the Municipality, did not comply with data protection law. The Complainant therefore decided to file a complaint with the Icelandic DPA. The CPC argued, for its part, that the disclosure of the personal data of the Complainant was necessary and therefore lawful for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest (Article 9(5) of the Icelandic Data Protection Act no. 90/2018 , and Article 6(1)(e) GDPR). The Municipality further argued that the report had been legally shared by the CPC on the basis of Articles 16, 17 or 18 of the Icelandic Child Welfare Act no. 80/2002, and that no provision in that law required the CPC or the Municipality to inform the Complainant about it beforehand. The Icelandic DPA reviewed the provisions of the applicable data protection law and of the Child Protection Act, to determine whether the processing of the personal data of the Complainant by the CPC and the Municipality was lawful. Having regard to the circumstances of t

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 2020010642 in IS

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

30 September 2021

Authority

Persónuvernd

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-4174

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 2020010642 - Iceland (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: