- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
DPA case 24-191 II#4781 – Complaint Upheld (Germany, 2022)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A customer of Deutsche Telekom AG complained that the company did not fully respond to their data access requests. The German Federal Data Protection Authority agreed that the company must provide complete information about data recipients and the origin of the data. This case emphasizes the importance of transparency in data handling.
What happened
A customer requested access to their data but received incomplete information from Deutsche Telekom AG.
Who was affected
The customer of Deutsche Telekom AG who sought access to their personal data.
What the authority found
The German Federal Data Protection Authority ruled that Deutsche Telekom AG must provide complete information about data recipients and the origin of the data.
Why this matters
This decision stresses the need for companies to be transparent when handling personal data. Businesses should ensure they fulfill data access requests fully to comply with privacy regulations.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The data subject is a customer and user of services by the Deutsche Telekom AG (controller), the biggest telecommunications and internet provider in Europe. The data subject requested access from the controller to all of his data under Article 15 GDPR. He also requested to have his data transmitted in a portable format under Article 20 GDPR. The controller responded to both requests. The data subject, however, considered that both responses were not complete. He argued that information about his traffic data, his contracts with the controller and his requests to the controller's customer service were missing. Furthermore, the data subject criticised that the controller did not list all recipients in its answer, but only the "most important" ones, that the origin of the data was not specified and that the storage duration was not mentioned. He, therefore, lodged a complaint with the German Federal Data Protection Authority (Der Bundesbeauftragte für den Datenschutz und die Informationsfreiheit - BfDI). The BfDI partially upheld the complaint. It confirmed the data subject's view that the controller is obligated under Article 15 GDPR to name all recipients and not only the "most important" ones, to specify the origin of the data and to mention the deletion date. However, the DPA found it was not necessary to list each and every individual transfer to a recipient. With regard to the contract documents, the DPA found that it was sufficient that the controller referred the data subject to the online customer portal where the data subject could retrieve those documents. Regarding the data subject’s requests to the customer service of the controller, the DPA found that these requests are usually handled manually by phone or by paper and not automatically. Accordingly, the DPA concluded that Article 20(1)(b) GDPR was not met. Furthermore, the DPA held that the data collected in the course of service requests must be deleted immediately after the purpose has been achieved
Outcome
Complaint Upheld
A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 24-191 II#4781 in DE
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 24-191 II#4781 - Germany (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: