- Enforcing jurisdiction
- European Union · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
DPA case Binding Decision 2/2022 – Order (European Union, 2022)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
The European Data Protection Board investigated Meta's Instagram regarding how it handled child users' accounts. They found that Instagram allowed children to switch to business accounts without proper safeguards for their contact information. This matters because it highlights the need for better protection of children's data online.
What happened
Meta's Instagram allowed child users to switch from personal to business accounts, exposing their contact information.
Who was affected
Child users of Instagram who switched their accounts to business accounts.
What the authority found
The investigation revealed that Instagram did not adequately protect the contact information of child users, violating GDPR requirements.
Why this matters
This case emphasizes the importance of protecting children's data and could lead to stricter regulations for platforms that cater to young users. Companies should ensure they have robust privacy measures in place for minors.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The DPC had conducted an investigation into Meta, specifically into Instagram. The DPC focused its investigation on two aspects. First: displayed information on business accounts of child users and second: default settings of newly created Instagram accounts. Based on this investigation, the DPC formulated a draft decision under Article 60(3) GDPR. Processing of contact information on child user’s business accounts The DPC held that Instagram permitted child users to switch from personal accounts to business accounts. During this switch from personal to business account, the child user was presented with an option screen (titled “Review Your Contact Info”). This screen was automatically filled with the user’s information, which was collected at the time of registration. The child user had the opportunity to modify this information. However, in order to complete switching process from personal- to business account, the child user also had to provide an email address or a phone number (contact information). Before September 2019, the phone number and e-mail were published on the respective user page in the form of a contact button. These contact details were not encrypted and visible in plain text. Since 4 September 2019, an updated version of this option screen was presented, with possibilities to modify contact details. Also, the user could choose not to provide any contact details at all. Before march 2019, the contact details of child users were also visible as plain text in the HTML source code of the web-version of Instagram. Also, for a time between August 2020 and November 2020, e-mail addresses of Instagram business accounts were visible in the HTML source code of the Instagram website as plain text, including to persons not registered as Instagram users. According to the DPC, by registering for a personal Instagram account, a data subject had to agree to the Instagram Terms of Use. The DPC held that Meta used two legal grounds in these terms o
Outcome
Order
A binding order requiring the controller to take specific action.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for DPA case Binding Decision 2/2022 in EU
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case Binding Decision 2/2022 - European Union (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: