Enforcing jurisdiction
Finland · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

DPA case 3895/83/22 – Violation Found (Finland, 2022)

Violation Found
DPA Tietosuojavaltuutetu23 June 2022Finland
final
Violation Found

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Finnish healthcare provider's plan to process patient data for health risk assessments was found to be problematic by the Finnish Data Protection Authority. The authority determined that the proposed system could lead to automated decisions that might negatively impact patients' health. This finding serves as a warning for healthcare providers about the risks of automated data processing.

What happened

The Finnish DPA found that the healthcare provider's data processing plan could result in automated decisions affecting patient care.

Who was affected

Patients at risk of health issues who would be identified through the healthcare provider's system.

What the authority found

The DPA concluded that the proposed processing involved automated decisions that could have significant adverse effects on patients, violating GDPR rules.

Why this matters

This case highlights the need for healthcare providers to carefully assess the implications of automated decision-making in patient care. It serves as a reminder to ensure compliance with data protection laws.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Art. 9(2)(h) GDPR
Art. 9(3) GDPR
Art. 22(1) GDPR
Art. 22(3) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(a) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Art. 9(GDPR)
Art. 9(3) GDPR
Art. 22(1) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(a) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Section 12(1) of the Act on the Status and Rights of Patients
Section 13 of the Patient Act

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The controller is a healtcare provider who requested the Finnish DPA to assess whether its planned system of processing patient data for scanning and prevention purposes would be compatible with the GDPR. Patients at risk to their health would be identified and referred to treatment through contact with the healthcare system. The patient population and medical records would be searched by a computer in order to identify patients at risk. The objectives of the approach would be to improve the health and well-being of individuals, prevent the onset and progression of diseases and improve equity in the health system. The Finnish DPA assessed the data processing operations involved, in particular the risk of automated decision-making and valid legal basis for processing sensitive data. First, the Finnish DPA assessed whether the envisaged processing of personal data would lead to automated individual decisions within the meaning of Article 22 GDPR. It distinguished between two instances: cases where patients would be selected for further examination on the basis of a risk assessment and patients who would not be selected after the risk assessment. For the first group, the result of the profiling would be taken into account only as one element of the decision-making process. The final decision would be taken by a trained person. Therefore, there would be human intervention in accordance with Article 22(3) GDPR. However, for the second group no further assessment by a competent person would be made. Hence, the DPA evaluated whether the profiling would produce legal or similarly significant effects to the patients who were rejected. It concluded that not being admitted to medical treatment could have significant adverse effects on the health of individuals. Accordingly, the envisaged processing would involve individual automated decisions prohibited under Article 22(1) GDPR. Second, the DPA looked at the legal basis the controller put forward for the processing of healt

Outcome

Violation Found

The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 3895/83/22 in FI

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

23 June 2022

Authority

DPA Tietosuojavaltuutetu

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-5365

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 3895/83/22 - Finland (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: