Enforcing jurisdiction
Sweden · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

DPA case DI-2020-10547 – Complaint Upheld (Sweden, 2022)

Complaint Upheld
Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten1 April 2022Sweden
final
Complaint Upheld

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Swedish company mistakenly sent marketing emails to a user who had opted out of receiving them. After the user complained, the company corrected the mistake but was still found to have violated data protection rules. This case emphasizes the importance of respecting user preferences in marketing communications.

What happened

The company sent marketing emails to a user who had declined to receive them.

Who was affected

The user who registered for the company's service but opted out of marketing emails.

What the authority found

The Swedish Data Protection Authority upheld the complaint, highlighting that the company failed to respect the user's choice.

Why this matters

This ruling reinforces that companies must honor user preferences regarding marketing communications. Businesses should regularly review their email practices to avoid similar issues.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Art. 12(3) GDPR
Art. 21(1) GDPR
Art. 21(2) GDPR
Art. 21(3) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(b) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Art. 12(3) GDPR
Art. 21(GDPR)
Art. 58(2)(b) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

Prompted by a complaint, the Swedish DPA initiated supervision pursuant to Article 56 GDPR in accordance with the Article 60 GDPR cooperation mechanism. The handover of the complaint was made by a German DPA, where the data subject lodged his complaint. The concerned supervisory authorities were located in Germany, Norway, Spain, Denmark, Poland, Italy, and Portugal. The concerned controller provided a subscription service for the digital distribution of newspapers and magazines in an app. On 5 November 2019, the data subject registered as a customer and user of the controller’s service but simultaneously declined to receive e-mails from the controller. Nevertheless, in the following days the data subject received e-mails from the controller. The data subject stated in the complaint that the date of the infringement was 12 November 2019. It was not until the data subject contacted the company's customer service on 28 November 2019 that the controller stopped sending e-mails. The controller confirmed that the data subject contacted it on 28 November 2019. It sent the data subject an e-mail on 29 November 2019, confirming that the data subject's e-mail address was unsubscribed from all future e-mails. The controller further stated that the mistake was caused by human error and fixed as soon as the data subject reached out. The controller claimed that the legal basis for processing of mailing was either based on the performance of contract (Article 6(1)(b) GDPR) or legitimate interest (Article 6(1)(f) GDPR), if the mailing was considered marketing. First, the DPA pointed out the applicable provisions. It noted that the processing of personal data must meet at least one of the conditions set out in Article 6(1) GDPR. Also, the DPA considered the rights of data subjects to object to processing of their personal data. Namely, according to Article 21(1) GDPR, the data subject shall have the right to object at any time to the processing of personal data relating to him

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case DI-2020-10547 in SE

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

1 April 2022

Authority

Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-5351

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case DI-2020-10547 - Sweden (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: