Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

DPA case 221 C 578/22 – Violation Found (Germany, 2022)

Violation Found
DPA4 August 2022Germany
final
Violation Found

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A German court ruled on a case involving a customer loyalty program where a user claimed their points were redeemed without permission. The court found no evidence of a data breach or unauthorized access, rejecting the user's claims. This ruling is important as it clarifies the responsibilities of companies in protecting customer data.

What happened

A customer claimed their loyalty program points were redeemed by unauthorized third parties.

Who was affected

A customer participating in a loyalty program offered by a company.

What the authority found

The court dismissed the customer's claims, stating there was no evidence of a data protection violation or cyberattack.

Why this matters

This decision reinforces that companies are not automatically liable for unauthorized transactions unless there is clear evidence of a data breach. Businesses should ensure they have strong security measures to protect customer information.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 32(1) GDPR
Art. 82(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 32(1) GDPR
Art. 82(1) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Art. 823(2) BGB
Art. 55(1) ZAG
Art. 675u(2) BGB
Decision AuthorityCourt

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject was a costumer who participated in the loyalty programme of the controller. Through the programme, costumers had the opportunity to collect points from their purchases from partner companies. Each point granted by a partner company has a monetary value of a number of cents. On 5 September 2021, twelve of the data subject’s points were converted into a goods voucher. The data subject claimed that the points were redeemed by third parties without authorisation. There were no documented cyberattacks or data protection incidents at the controller on that day. Next to various claims under German Civil Law, the data subject sought damages from the controller for a breach of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The data subject claimed that the controller was a payment service provider within the meaning of the standard according to Article 823(2) BGB conjoined with Article 55(1) Payment Service Oversight Act (ZAG) and that the points of the defendant were electronic money. Therefore, the defendant would have been obliged to require two-factor authentication. Because the controller's security measures were not state-of-the-art and could not guarantee a high enough level of protection pursuant to Article 32(1) GDPR, the data subject claimed damages pursuant to Article 82(1) GDPR. The controller argued to the contrary that the customer loyalty programme did not constitute electronic money and thus did not require a stronger customer authentication. Consequently, it asserted that its loyalty programme guaranteed an adequate technical and organisational level or protection for the customers’ accounts within the meaning of Article 32(1) GDPR. The court rejected all the data subject's claims. To assess if the loyalty programme would have necessitated a two factor authentication and was therefore in breach of Article 31(1) GDPR, the court used German law to examine, firstly, whether the programme constituted a payment service and, secondly, wheth

Outcome

Violation Found

The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 221 C 578/22 in DE

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

4 August 2022

Authority

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-5452

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 221 C 578/22 - Germany (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: